Teams

ETC-Davis

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.56 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-02-26vs NWW-CP-van ZylLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Casey / Amanda McKay vs Usha Rao / Paige Jensen6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAlysson Bashey vs Jessica Zhi3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesFrances Costigan / Dawn Klinghoffer vs Tracy Brodahl / Joleen Lester0-6, 2-6
2023-02-19vs PL-The Volley Llamas-SmallLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Danoff / Frances Costigan vs Xiaobei Li / Eloisa Tang3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAlysson Bashey vs Jo James4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Davis / Dara Lockert vs Mary Lane / Yasmina Bahi7-5, 7-6
2023-02-12vs TCSP-Full Metal Rackets-SteckWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Davis / Alysson Bashey vs Carrie Morris / Rhonda Bethurum4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesHillary Peterman vs Teresa Engrav6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDawn Klinghoffer / Jane Yeh vs Tara Nelson / Christine Henn6-4, 6-3
2023-02-03vs TCSP-SpainLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Davis / Frances Costigan vs Lisa Sowder / Jane Vail7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJane Yeh vs Janice Gupta6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Bussell / Hillary Peterman vs Bryn Young / Aleana Harris4-6, 4-6
2023-01-29vs NWW-WSC-Raquettes-OnuLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Davis / Dawn Klinghoffer vs Snezhana Stefanova / Raluca Hera4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesHillary Peterman vs Monica Cretu1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda McKay / Mary Casey vs Anca Zaharia / Maria Smintina2-6, 2-6
2023-01-21vs BAIN-The Slice Girls-CarrilloWon 21
L#1 DoublesFrances Costigan / Susan Bussell vs Leticia Blacker / Jennifer Carrillo4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAlysson Bashey vs Angie Godfrey6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelissa Davis / Nancy Danoff vs Tara Moyer / Pondra Perkins7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-01-14vs BC-Double Trouble-CarlisleLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Danoff / Alysson Bashey vs Ann Carlisle / Joia Poort6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJennifer Monahan DeMella vs Kathryn Soligon1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Casey / Susan Bussell vs Tanya Rizzo / Erin Park3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-07vs NWW-CP-van ZylLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Yeh / Jennifer Monahan DeMella vs Katie van Zyl / Juiling Edmonds3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAlysson Bashey vs Tracy Brodahl0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Bussell / Dara Lockert vs Amy Wang / Roo Mulligan3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Alysson Bashey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.32
Dawn Klinghoffer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Dara Lockert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Jane Yeh
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.17
Susan Bussell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.13
Beth Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.10
Hillary Peterman
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.07
Mary Casey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.02
Melissa Davis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Amanda McKay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Frances Costigan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 0
Jennifer Monahan DeMella
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Danoff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hillary Peterman + Alysson Bashey4453% games+13.7% vs expected
Alysson Bashey + Melissa Davis13956% games+8.6% vs expected
Susan Bussell + Dara Lockert4157% games+4.3% vs expected
Susan Bussell + Hillary Peterman3350% games+1.7% vs expected
Hillary Peterman + Melissa Davis3642% games−2.1% vs expected
Hillary Peterman + Dawn Klinghoffer3741% games−9.1% vs expected
Beth Swanson + Jane Yeh0530% games−9.6% vs expected
Mary Casey + Amanda McKay1444% games−10.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alysson Bashey
40W–48L career · 6 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Dawn Klinghoffer
44W–41L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
0%91%9%
2.32
2.5
Dara Lockert
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jane Yeh
19W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
2.19
2.5
Susan Bussell
21W–49L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Beth Swanson
12W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Hillary Peterman
30W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Mary Casey
23W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07
2.5
Melissa Davis
32W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Amanda McKay
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
0
Frances Costigan
0W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Monahan DeMella
5W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Danoff
10W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.