Teams

WSC-Full Metal Rackets-Hummer

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-12vs BAIN-BlackerWon 21
L#1 DoublesEric Botterbusch / Mike Gilkey vs Adam Rabinowitz / David Moore3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHank Chin / Steven Bishop vs Ned Kiley / Stephen Shapiro6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJOHN GLOVER / Jeff Leopold vs Matthew McCoy / Mike Baggett6-4, 6-1
2022-10-21vs FC-BadFellas-CalpeWon 30
W#1 DoublesHank Chin / Steven Bishop vs Douglas Pearson / David Taft6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJOHN GLOVER / Mike Gilkey vs Sandy Chow / Reggie Santos3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Higginbotham / Mark Sorensen vs Brian Odgers / Clarke Speed6-3, 6-1
2022-10-16vs BC-Sekins/ManningLost 12
L#1 DoublesEric Botterbusch / Mike Gilkey vs Bret Arsenault / Brian Rayfield0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJOHN GLOVER / Steven Bishop vs Michael Myers / Ali Siahpush3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHank Chin / John Anderson vs Rick Bohdanowicz / Craighton Goeppele6-3, 6-2
2022-10-08vs NWW-HBSQ-PolettiLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Anderson / Ray Hisayasu vs Bruce Adee / Gordon Williams0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEric Botterbusch / Steven Bishop vs George Sampson / Michael Lynagh6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDavid Higginbotham / Jonathan Hummer vs Don Little / Jac Hand0-6, 1-6
2022-10-02vs CP-McCarthyWon 21
L#1 DoublesEric Botterbusch / John Anderson vs Gamage Viriththamulla / Michael Robon5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJOHN GLOVER / Steven Bishop vs Adam Lund / Justin VonGortler6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJonathan Hummer / Mark Sorensen vs Michael Ensing / Bob Isaacson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-25vs BETC-IkedaLost 12
W#1 DoublesMike Gilkey / JOHN GLOVER vs Steven Erickson / Roy Higashi7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJonathan Hummer / Mark Sorensen vs Daniel Benoit / Lawson Mansfield3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Anderson / Ray Hisayasu vs Patrick Mason / Rich Riotto2-6, 3-6
2022-09-18vs TCSP-PhillipsWon 30
W#1 DoublesEric Botterbusch / Mike Gilkey vs Alexander Friedrich / Scott Curtis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHank Chin / Steven Bishop vs Bryan Hester / Stevan Phillips6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Higginbotham / Mark Sorensen vs Mike Withey / Tony Auriemma6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2022-09-11vs RBW-Racquet Science-FaloonWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Higginbotham / Mark Sorensen vs Yury Uzhansky / Douglas Scott3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJOHN GLOVER / Steven Bishop vs Garold Jang / Mike Otto6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Anderson / Hank Chin vs Jim McGinley / Rodney Rowen6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Hank Chin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.53
JOHN GLOVER
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.35
Eric Botterbusch
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.32
David Higginbotham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.14
Mark Sorensen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Mike Gilkey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Jonathan Hummer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Steven Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.73
Ray Hisayasu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jeff Leopold
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ray Hisayasu + Hank Chin4254% games+0.1% vs expected
Eric Botterbusch + David Higginbotham151055% games−1.2% vs expected
Jonathan Hummer + Eric Botterbusch7451% games−3.7% vs expected
Jonathan Hummer + Ray Hisayasu0723% games−21.1% vs expected
Steven Bishop + Ray Hisayasu2838% gamesnot enough data
Steven Bishop + Hank Chin5262% gamesnot enough data
Mike Gilkey + Hank Chin4168% gamesnot enough data
Jonathan Hummer + Steven Bishop224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hank Chin
68W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
JOHN GLOVER
50W–32L career · 13 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Eric Botterbusch
75W–54L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
David Higginbotham
73W–94L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
Mark Sorensen
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.14
3
Mike Gilkey
109W–152L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Jonathan Hummer
34W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Steven Bishop
48W–49L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Ray Hisayasu
54W–102L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Jeff Leopold
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.