Teams

RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-16vs CASTLEWOOD CC 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesPatti Presto / Cynthia James vs Kathy D'Onofrio / Pensri Walsh6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Belinda Buchanan
published 3.5
3.48
Sandrine Chobert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Kim Sakaue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Julie Borjon
published 3.5
3.34
Belinda Castillo
published 3.5
3.29
Angie Koontz
published 3.5
3.28
Patti Presto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
April Mundy
published 3.5
3.26
Corri Synak
published 3.5
3.23
Cindy Mark
published 3.5
3.15
Amy Bull
published 3.5
3.14
Emilie Linick
published
3.12
Melissa Sano
published
3.12
Rosalynd Zahiri
published 3.5
3.06
Julie Askins
published
2.99
Catherine Sampietro
published 3.5
Robin Hultgren
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Sano + Amy Bull033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Belinda Buchanan
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Sandrine Chobert
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Kim Sakaue
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Julie Borjon
92W–55L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Belinda Castillo
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Angie Koontz
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Patti Presto
25W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
April Mundy
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Corri Synak
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Cindy Mark
16W–26L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Amy Bull
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Emilie Linick
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Melissa Sano
8W–21L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Rosalynd Zahiri
94W–58L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
Julie Askins
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.06
3.5
Catherine Sampietro
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Robin Hultgren
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.