Teams

TEvans/MWalker (Carmel)

2023 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-02vs JLandesman (Palisades)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStacy Doline / Tammy Langdon vs Laura Cass / Brenda Strawn1-6, 0-6
2023-09-25vs ASykes (OPRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara Diachenko / Tammy Langdon vs Arlene Conger / Patti Ratcliffe1-6, 1-6
2023-09-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTammy Langdon / Janat Schramm vs Paula Bradley / Michelle Martin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-08-14vs JLandesman (Palisades)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJanat Schramm / Mary White vs Jennifer Lundberg / Donna Musante2-6, 2-6
2023-08-07vs ASykes (OPRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJanat Schramm / Susan Taylor vs Carolyn Butler / Patti Ratcliffe1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Lauren Mulligan
published
3.55
Robyn Hoppe
published
3.30
Missy Goodrich
published
3.26
Andra Norman
published 3.5
3.20
Molly Morris
published
3.00
Janat Schramm
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Tammy Langdon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Toni Evans
published
2.95
Barbara Diachenko
published 3.5
2.76
Mary Ruth Faulkner
published
2.51
Stacy Doline
published
Dorian Dipangrazio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janat Schramm + Tammy Langdon3355% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Mulligan + Missy Goodrich404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Mulligan
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.56
Robyn Hoppe
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
Missy Goodrich
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Andra Norman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
Molly Morris
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Janat Schramm
31W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Tammy Langdon
10W–25L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Toni Evans
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.95
3.5
Barbara Diachenko
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
Mary Ruth Faulkner
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
2.76
Stacy Doline
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
Dorian Dipangrazio
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.