Teams

B8 Westwood Anthony

2023 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo 6.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-09-07vs B5 Bon Air FenstermacherLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer White / Julie Shudtz vs Jeanne Albright / Kristen Powers6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-30vs B2 ACAC Davis-BlackburnWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Shudtz / Jennifer White vs LOUISA HARRISON / Erika King3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-09vs B3 RCC KochWon 10
W#3 DoublesAshley Sommardahl / Caren Payne vs Amy Boschen / Pamela Albrecht6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Katy Holder
published
3.39
Kate Hamilton
published
3.35
Julia Foutz
published
3.35
Jennifer White
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Elizabeth Keith
published 3.5
3.25
Holly Martin
published 3.5
3.24
Becky Anthony
published 3.5
3.13
Julie Shudtz
published
3.13
Meredith Schwartz
published
2.99
Caren Payne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Renee Gilman
published
2.94
2.88
Annette King
published 3
2.87
Julia Baker
published
2.65
Jill Prince
published
Lauren King
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caren Payne + Jennifer White5748% games+3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katy Holder
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
Kate Hamilton
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
Julia Foutz
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
Jennifer White
104W–70L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Elizabeth Keith
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Holly Martin
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Becky Anthony
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Julie Shudtz
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
Meredith Schwartz
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Caren Payne
111W–68L career · 1 line in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.99
Renee Gilman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
Jennifer Combs-Pokrywka
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Annette King
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
Julia Baker
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Ashley Sommardahl
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
Jill Prince
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren King
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.