Teams

Colleyville Park/Urano W4.5

2024 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

21 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
4.39
Ashley Reaves
published 4.5
4.26
Michelle Behm
published
4.26
Kate VandeBerghe
published
4.25
Livene Rose-Munoz
published
4.25
Melissa Walters
published
4.18
Ashli Urano
published 4.5
4.15
Aubrey Findley
published 4.5
4.14
Corrine Quast
published 4.5
4.14
Kenda Bevill
published
4.09
Vanessa Kelley
published
4.04
Andrea Girolamo
published 4.5
4.03
Jody Hassemer
published
4.01
Jill Montgomery
published
3.99
Ryoko Suzuki
published
3.96
Claire Stone
published 4.5
3.95
3.92
Laura Marroquin
published
3.88
Tara Morgan
published
3.87
Jill Pham
published
3.72
Andrea Taylor
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate VandeBerghe + Michelle Behm8061% games+9.9% vs expected
Melissa Walters + Livene Rose-Munoz7457% games−0.7% vs expected
Aubrey Findley + Vanessa Kelley5646% games−10.1% vs expected
Kate VandeBerghe + Kenda Bevill0743% games−14.4% vs expected
Corrine Quast + Livene Rose-Munoz4157% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Reaves + Ashli Urano314 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Walters + Vanessa Kelley303 matchesnot enough data
Ashli Urano + Laura Marroquin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Courtney McClurkin
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.42
4.5
Ashley Reaves
40W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
4.39
Michelle Behm
23W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.26
Kate VandeBerghe
77W–39L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
4.26
Livene Rose-Munoz
33W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
Melissa Walters
30W–17L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Ashli Urano
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Aubrey Findley
47W–23L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Corrine Quast
17W–17L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
4.14
Kenda Bevill
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
4.14
Vanessa Kelley
26W–17L career · no lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Andrea Girolamo
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
4.04
Jody Hassemer
26W–13L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
4.03
Jill Montgomery
17W–20L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
Ryoko Suzuki
23W–37L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.99
4.5
Claire Stone
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.96
Sue Lopez de Correia
27W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.95
Laura Marroquin
28W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.92
Tara Morgan
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
3.88
Jill Pham
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Andrea Taylor
51W–18L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.