Teams

Cady's Mixed 6.0

2021 Frederick County Mixed 18 & Over · Frederick County Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-03-01vs JONESLost 01
L#3 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Michele Hansen vs Jason LaRose / Kimberly LaRose2-6, 2-6
2021-02-22vs JONESLost 01
L#3 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Michele Hansen vs Jason LaRose / Kimberly LaRose6-7, 1-6
2021-02-15Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Michele Hansen vs Craig Gordon / Melissa Galloway4-6, 3-6
2021-01-28vs JONESLost 01
L#3 DoublesSteffie Cannella Beck / Chad King vs Cecilia-Hien Phan / Joseph Jacangelo4-6, 1-6
2021-01-24vs Hawk 6.0 MixedLost 01
L#3 DoublesChad King / Steffie Cannella Beck vs MATTHEW HEINRICHS / Stacey Donaldson2-6, 3-6
2021-01-19vs JONESLost 01
L#1 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Carol Bernard vs Andrew Brammer / Millette Miller3-6, 0-6
2021-01-13Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStacie King / Majed Hamawy vs Stacey Donaldson / David Price5-7, 2-6
2021-01-09Lost 01
L#3 DoublesShaunte Taswell / Majed Hamawy vs STACEY WOLFE / Gordon Buist3-6, 4-6
2021-01-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Carol Bernard vs Charlotte Schlee / David Price6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick County Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Traci Bidinger
published
3.07
Steffie Cannella Beck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Majed Hamawy
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.79
Benjamin HAYES
published 3
2.61
Chad King
published 3
2.46
Carol Bernard
published 3
2.46
Shaunte Taswell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Stacie King
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad King + Stacie King5457% gamesnot enough data
Majed Hamawy + Shaunte Taswell2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Traci Bidinger
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
94%6%<1%
3.30
3.5
Steffie Cannella Beck
114W–111L career · 2 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–517L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Benjamin HAYES
3W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Chad King
9W–17L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
2.61
3
Carol Bernard
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
2.46
2.5
Shaunte Taswell
78W–105L career · 1 line in 2021
0%63%37%
2.46
Stacie King
12W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.