Teams

NEGTA/Allyson Reeves

2024 · 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

14 players · average NTRP 3.08 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-12-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesAllyson Reeves / Margaret Gaines vs Barb Miller / Angie Sisk6-2, 6-4
2024-10-25Won 10
W#4 DoublesMargaret Gaines / Joan Grabau vs Barbara Dumont / Cindy Reed6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Margaret Gaines
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Christine Slate
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Cathy Cobb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Allyson Reeves
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.88
Kimberly Sekulow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Melanie Abernathy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Claudia Kempen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Meredith West
published
2.84
Eve Sartain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Kara Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Amy Britt
published 3
2.58
Joan Grabau
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Debbie Westray
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Temple Makuch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Cobb + Melanie Abernathy4253% games+5.4% vs expected
Allyson Reeves + Melanie Abernathy141053% games+4.9% vs expected
Cathy Cobb + Allyson Reeves224 matchesnot enough data
Amy Britt + Meredith West224 matchesnot enough data
Allyson Reeves + Eve Sartain134 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Westray + Joan Grabau033 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Cobb + Claudia Kempen033 matchesnot enough data
Amy Britt + Kara Lewis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Gaines
34W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
3.5
Christine Slate
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cathy Cobb
27W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Allyson Reeves
29W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Kimberly Sekulow
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.88
Melanie Abernathy
27W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Claudia Kempen
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Meredith West
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
Eve Sartain
10W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Kara Lewis
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Amy Britt
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Joan Grabau
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Debbie Westray
4W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.36
Temple Makuch
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.