Teams

Eastern/Ortiz/18&Over8.0XD

2024 18&Over Mixed · 8.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-03-30vs Team FerranteSplit 11
W#2 DoublesVladi Tsipenyuk / Chie Masubuchi vs Eddie Demirci / Lisa Frantz6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRebecca Wehrle / Shihas Vamanjoor vs Jon Rubinstein / Cecilia Orchard2-6, 4-6
2024-03-23vs Team SpartaWon 10
W#3 DoublesJACOB PEREZ / Rebecca Wehrle vs Raj Navalurkar / Ashlynne O'Brien6-2, 6-2
2024-03-17vs Vista: The WildlingsWon 10
W#2 DoublesYuya Ikeda / Tina Gonzalez vs Rudolf van Mol / Stephanie van Zanten6-7, 4-2, 1-0
2024-03-16vs Jersey StrongWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Kim / Vladi Tsipenyuk vs Donna Ricker / Francois Vernet6-3, 6-1
2024-03-09vs Team FerranteWon 10
W#2 DoublesVladi Tsipenyuk / Christine Kim vs Tanya Kotov / Casey Schnabel7-6, 6-2
2024-03-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesHarish Kumar / Tina Gonzalez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-02vs Team SpartaWon 10
W#2 DoublesYuko Nishimura / JACOB PEREZ vs Johann Lim / Tomira Rozar6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-02-24vs Jersey StrongLost 01
L#2 DoublesJACOB PEREZ / Yuko Nishimura vs Allison Liss / Francois Vernet7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-02-11vs Mixed NutsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJon Rubinstein / Tina Gonzalez vs Elme Schmid / Kaptan Karsolia6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Ferrante0919818196
2Eastern/Ortiz/18&Over8.0XD0920720203
3Jersey Strong09121534251
4Team Sparta0932449307

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Natasha Sauerborn
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published 5
4.40
Vladi Tsipenyuk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.30
JACOB PEREZ
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.25
Shihas Vamanjoor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.24
Saori Shiokawa
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.23
Carlos Vasquez Sr
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.21
Enrique Baez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
4.20
Megumi Smillie
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.10
Anushka Joshi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.09
Robert Khalev
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
4.04
Jonathan Ordonez
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
3.84
Chie Masubuchi
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
Christine Kim
published 4
3.63
Jim Serrano
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.63
Stephanie Heitner
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.42
Peter Ortiz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Tina Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.22
Rebecca Wehrle
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
Yuko Nishimura
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anushka Joshi + Enrique Baez7159% games+11.9% vs expected
Megumi Smillie + Jonathan Ordonez10257% games+5.6% vs expected
Stephanie Heitner + Carlos Vasquez Sr6262% games+1.0% vs expected
Rebecca Wehrle + Carlos Vasquez Sr2352% gamesnot enough data
Tina Gonzalez + Robert Khalev404 matchesnot enough data
Chie Masubuchi + Robert Khalev224 matchesnot enough data
Peter Ortiz + Megumi Smillie123 matchesnot enough data
Tina Gonzalez + Jim Serrano123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Natasha Sauerborn
188W–57L career · 13 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.58
Vladi Tsipenyuk
82W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
4.40
JACOB PEREZ
74W–53L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
Shihas Vamanjoor
38W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%3%
4.25
4.5
Saori Shiokawa
167W–28L career · 10 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Carlos Vasquez Sr
110W–87L career · 8 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Enrique Baez
28W–13L career · 12 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Megumi Smillie
219W–84L career · 15 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Anushka Joshi
49W–16L career · 12 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
Robert Khalev
71W–39L career · 7 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.09
Jonathan Ordonez
72W–37L career · 14 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
4.04
4
Chie Masubuchi
99W–27L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Christine Kim
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jim Serrano
61W–57L career · 5 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Stephanie Heitner
93W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Peter Ortiz
94W–209L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.42
Tina Gonzalez
171W–134L career · 10 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Rebecca Wehrle
100W–117L career · 13 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Yuko Nishimura
29W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.