Teams

CDTA S M18&OX10.0 2.Lake Bluff Pacaut Thur 6:30 $22

CDTA 1Summer Mixed 18 & Over · CDTA 18 & Over 10.0 Mixed Summer

16 players · average NTRP 4.88 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-06-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNicole Kitsuse / Peter Shields vs Emma Forman / Brian Utz6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · CDTA 18 & Over 10.0 Mixed Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S M18&OX10.0 2.Lake Bluff Pacaut Thur 6:30 $227119514185
2CDTA S M18&OX10.0 3.Lakeshore Natarajan Sat 5 $263571735257
3CDTA S M18&OX10.0 1.Tam Copland Sun 4 $2226101429219

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.98
Alice Pacaut
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
Alex Donkor
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
Annemarie Emme
published 5
4.32
Megan Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.27
Connor Stelter
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.19
Kaitlin Ulbert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.14
Mike Polisner
published
4.11
Nicholas Hebda
published
Christian Duchnak
published
Herman Abban
published
Johan Brun
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
John Cheregi
published
Marija Jovicic
published
Nicole Kitsuse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Shields
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Herman Abban + Alice Pacaut404 matchesnot enough data
Megan Nguyen + Peter Shields303 matchesnot enough data
Connor Stelter + Alice Pacaut303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alice Pacaut
143W–36L career · 10 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.98
5
Alex Donkor
24W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Annemarie Emme
3W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Nguyen
100W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
4.32
4.5
Connor Stelter
16W–9L career · type M · 7 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
Kaitlin Ulbert
57W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
4.19
Mike Polisner
13W–19L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
4.14
Nicholas Hebda
18W–9L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
Christian Duchnak
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Herman Abban
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Johan Brun
13W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Cheregi
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marija Jovicic
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marina Hermanny de Figueiredo
8W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicole Kitsuse
31W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Peter Shields
121W–52L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.