Teams

Acopi:Hamel

2025 Summer Tri-Level · 3.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-08-04vs Apex:HuberWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Stewart / Michael Hamel vs Gregory Adey / Nate Huber6-0, 6-3
2025-07-27vs Apex:SchachterWon 10
W#1 DoublesYang Fan / Malcolm Avore vs Joseph Radkowski / Robert Volis6-1, 7-6
2025-07-23vs MP:BoyleWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Stewart / Michael Hamel vs Luke Lyndaker / Hahna Patterson6-3, 6-2
2025-07-17vs Apex:PiccoloWon 10
W#1 DoublesMalcolm Avore / Yang Fan vs Gary Piccolo / Andrew Piccolo6-3, 6-4
2025-07-09vs Apex:ChadbourneWon 10
W#1 DoublesYang Fan / Michael Hamel vs Marc Chadbourne / Christian Kryger6-3, 6-1
2025-07-02vs Apex:MaineLob-Sters:BlassWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Stewart / Malcolm Avore vs Austen Blass / Vincent Edwards6-4, 6-4
2023-09-30vs Apex:SchachterWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Hamel / Mark Keith vs Dave Kroondyk / Andy Schachter6-1, 6-1
2023-09-14vs Apex:ChadbourneWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Hamel / Mark Keith vs Marc Chadbourne / Andrew Piccolo6-4, 6-2
2023-09-12vs Apex:ChadbourneLost 01
L#1 DoublesYang Fan / Mark Keith vs Marc Chadbourne / Andrew Piccolo5-7, 6-7
2023-08-21vs Apex:SchachterLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Hamel / Yang Fan vs Andy Schachter / Dave Kroondyk4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Michael Hamel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
James Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Yang Fan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Malcolm Avore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yang Fan + Michael Hamel4169% games+11.2% vs expected
Malcolm Avore + Michael Hamel6063% games+8.2% vs expected
Malcolm Avore + James Stewart7061% games+3.1% vs expected
James Stewart + Michael Hamel5356% games+1.7% vs expected
Yang Fan + Malcolm Avore224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Hamel
77W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
James Stewart
66W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Yang Fan
45W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Malcolm Avore
37W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.