Teams

Dulin 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 18 & Over Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs Emmendorfer 18s 7.5W Combo Thur PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesTracy Harlan / Jen Strasser vs Hannah Higgins / Casey Emmendorfer4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Clancy / Catherine Tanner vs Caroline Yates / Cameron Wannamaker4-6, 0-6
2026-08-20vs Easley 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PMLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristina Campbell / Jen Strasser vs Nan Elizabeth Joyce / Vangie Cruz6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSusan Parsons / Debbie Clancy vs Dell Barbee / Karyn Efird2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCatherine Tanner / Robin Crosier vs Kathy Pace / Elaine Fox3-6, 6-7
2026-08-09vs Russo 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Gujrati / Erin Huffines vs Melissa Doupe / Stacey Russo4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Howell / Betty Kramer vs Molly Norris / Libby Strickland1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesYvonne Singh / Robin Crosier vs Julia Fresina / Stephanie Adams6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 7.5 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Goy 18s 7.5 Combo W Thurs PM2051442
2Isner/Strassell 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM2154989
3Bettinger/Kraska 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1021222
4Dulin 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1021433
5Dean 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1142548
6Easley 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1133863
7Emmendorfer 18s 7.5W Combo Thur PM1124847
8Mavronikolas/Tao 18s 7.5W Combo %hu4w PM1133960
9Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM12451177
10Russo 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM0224853
11Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM02151162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Christina Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Erin Huffines
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Sarah Howell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Catherine Tanner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Yvonne Singh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Tracy Harlan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Debbie Clancy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Betty Kramer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Melissa Gujrati
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Michele Shigo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Robin Crosier
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Jen Strasser
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Hayes Mills
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Amy Dulin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Harlan + Catherine Tanner3346% games−8.8% vs expected
Robin Crosier + Amy Dulin1448% gamesnot enough data
Robin Crosier + Michele Shigo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Campbell
34W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Erin Huffines
173W–129L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
Sarah Howell
32W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Catherine Tanner
40W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Yvonne Singh
13W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
Tracy Harlan
23W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Debbie Clancy
30W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
3.42
3.5
Betty Kramer
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Melissa Gujrati
18W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Michele Shigo
21W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Robin Crosier
17W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Jen Strasser
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Hayes Mills
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Amy Dulin
8W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.