Teams

ESB:BROWN

2021 VT Adult 65 & Over Women · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-08-08vs ESB:BASELINE BOOMERS:VANKLEECKLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Bouyea / Nancy Mead vs Allyson Bolduc / Marjorie Gale0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Ellis / Karin Ericson vs Christine Campbell / Phyllis Marcell2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAileen Kraus / Arlene Ingraham vs Patricia Sabalis / Laurel Clark0-6, 1-6
2021-08-01vs ESB:BASELINE BOOMERS:VANKLEECKLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Brown / Sarah Ellis vs Allyson Bolduc / Marjorie Gale6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHolly Feingold / Karin Ericson vs Lynda Vankleeck / Carol Goodrum4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Mead / Aileen Kraus vs Sherwood Daniels / Faith Hadden6-7, 4-1, 1-0
2021-07-27vs ESB:BASELINE BOOMERS:VANKLEECKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSarah Brown / Holly Feingold vs Patricia Sabalis / Helga Immerfall3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Bouyea / Nancy Mead vs Lynda Vankleeck / Sherwood Daniels6-4, 7-6
2021-07-11vs ESB:BASELINE BOOMERS:VANKLEECKLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Brown / Sarah Ellis vs Christine Campbell / Phyllis Marcell1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Feingold / Karin Ericson vs Helga Immerfall / Patricia Sabalis0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Bouyea / Arlene Ingraham vs Laurel Clark / Faith Hadden2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Carol Bouyea
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Sarah Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Aileen Kraus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Arlene Ingraham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Holly Feingold
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Karin Ericson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Mead
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Bouyea + Nancy Mead2436% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Bouyea
23W–38L career · 3 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
Sarah Ellis
14W–24L career · 3 lines in 2021
83%17%<1%
2.88
Aileen Kraus
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Arlene Ingraham
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Holly Feingold
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karin Ericson
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Mead
10W–18L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Brown
13W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.