Teams

Heritage Bay / Ludwig

2026 Collier Adult 65 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-16vs World Tennis Club / HueyLost 12
W#1 DoublesTomie Faganely / Donald Scanlon vs Kyle MacY / Fred Drilling6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPhilip Ludwig / Edward Underwood vs Terry Funk / Kirk Huey6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJay Love / Richard Schneider vs Richard Wright / Jim Tagley5-7, 4-6
2025-12-09vs Pelican Bay / OwlerLost 12
L#1 DoublesJay Love / Donald Scanlon vs David Nelson / Scott Brown2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRichard Schneider / Edward Underwood vs Mark Stetzel / Phil Mercurio4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTomie Faganely / Philip Ludwig vs Michael Mitzell / John Owler6-1, 6-4
2025-12-06vs Sterling Oaks / B. MarksLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonald Scanlon / Philip Ludwig vs Andy Gustafson / James Foley5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTomie Faganely / Gary Despins vs Robert Jackson / Mike Seats6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRichard Schneider / Edward Underwood vs Barry Marks / Ed Kokkila7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-12-02vs COLLIER/adult65&over8.0M/ MishkoLost 02
L#1 DoublesJay Love / Tomie Faganely vs Jay Freedman / Jerry Cole2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Schneider / Edward Underwood vs John Dolle / Tom Franklin2-6, 3-6
2025-11-11vs World Tennis Club / HueyLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteve Geller / Craig Tammen vs Kyle MacY / Brien Freeman1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTomie Faganely / Gary Despins vs Fred Drilling / Patrick Bologna6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJay Love / Richard Schneider vs Terry Funk / Patrick Donnelly3-6, 3-6
2025-11-04vs Pelican Bay / OwlerWon 21
L#1 DoublesJay Love / Craig Tammen vs Howard Ames / David Nelson1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Geller / Donald Scanlon vs Michael Mitzell / Bob Wilkie7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGary Despins / Tomie Faganely vs Phil Mercurio / Peter Thompson6-2, 6-1
2025-10-28vs COLLIER/adult65&over8.0M/ MishkoWon 21
L#1 DoublesJay Love / Donald Scanlon vs Robert Kuehling / Kevin Wilson3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCraig Tammen / Steve Geller vs John Dolle / Jeff Lassell3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTomie Faganely / Gary Despins vs Richard Werner / Brant Latham6-1, 6-1
2025-10-21vs Sterling Oaks / B. MarksWon 30
W#1 DoublesCraig Tammen / Steve Geller vs Andy Gustafson / James Foley2-6, 0-3
W#2 DoublesTomie Faganely / Gary Despins vs Barry Marks / Aric Rudden6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Schneider / Donald Scanlon vs Robert Jackson / Ernest Levy2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1COLLIER/adult65&over8.0M/ Mishko6216817164
2Sterling Oaks / B. Marks44111329225
3World Tennis Club / Huey44111330233
4Pelican Bay / Owler35111330230
5Heritage Bay / Ludwig35111331244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Craig Tammen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Donald Scanlon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Edward Underwood
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Frank Carrabba
published
Gary Despins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Jay Love
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Philip Ludwig
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Geller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tomie Faganely
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Vernon Keesey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tomie Faganely + Gary Despins12263% gamesnot enough data
Jay Love + Donald Scanlon5356% gamesnot enough data
Jay Love + Craig Tammen3248% gamesnot enough data
Craig Tammen + Steve Geller213 matchesnot enough data
Richard Schneider + Edward Underwood033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Craig Tammen
199W–143L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
Donald Scanlon
31W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Edward Underwood
2W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Frank Carrabba
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Gary Despins
14W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jay Love
58W–46L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Philip Ludwig
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Schneider
3W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve Geller
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tomie Faganely
16W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vernon Keesey
30W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.