Teams

LLHissom/LNTC

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Women 5.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-17vs LMRobinson/WestportWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnnemarie Mahoney / Tina Krohn vs Fran Emerzian / Jennifer Johnston7-5, 6-1
2022-10-10vs LKPowell/WestportLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeedee Beem / Annemarie Mahoney vs Carrie Davin / Danielle Curwood2-6, 3-6
2022-10-03vs LSSchneider/NMPSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDeedee Beem / Cheryl Strouse vs Karen Pippin / Leslie Shaw6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Bochey / Elizabeth Davis vs Martine Maness / Natalie Hallman3-6, 6-7
2022-09-26vs LMRobinson/WestportLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeedee Beem / Cheryl Strouse vs Astrid Peterson / DIANE FIORE7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Barber / Annemarie Mahoney vs Nicole Kayton / Nancy Hibsch5-7, 0-6
2022-09-19vs LKPowell/WestportLost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Plua / Mary Lehman vs Bridgett Dedmond / Sheila Chast1-6, 1-6
2022-09-12vs LSSchneider/NMPWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatricia Bochey / Elizabeth Davis vs Kelli Rester / Martine Maness3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-08-29vs LMRobinson/WestportWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeedee Beem / Cheryl Strouse vs Holly Reiter / DIANE FIORE6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-08-22vs LKPowell/WestportLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatricia Bochey / Cindy Plua vs Danielle Curwood / Dana Andrews2-6, 0-6
2022-08-20vs LSSchneider/NMPLost 02
L#1 DoublesFlorence Hardymon / Cindy Plua vs Sayra Brynn / Amy Barnett0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDeedee Beem / Cheryl Strouse vs Samantha Schneider / Kelli Rester5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Cindy Plua
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Cheryl Strouse
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Deedee Beem
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.70
Tina Krohn
published
2.65
Annemarie Mahoney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Jennifer Denzler
published
2.49
Christine Dacko
published 3
2.41
Patricia Bochey
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Strouse + Deedee Beem3348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cindy Plua
56W–50L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Cheryl Strouse
17W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Deedee Beem
29W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
2.85
Tina Krohn
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Annemarie Mahoney
9W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Jennifer Denzler
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Christine Dacko
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.49
3
Patricia Bochey
42W–84L career · 3 lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.