Teams

CTL55/GREEN/WWD

Mixed Doubles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Mixed 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-27vs CTL (A) 3.5M 55 & Over (Pool)Won 30
W#1 DoublesPatrick Layden / Wyndi Green vs Michael Beam / Beth McCorkle2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaige Easley / Jennifer Wilson vs David Ford / Kerry Ford6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRon Gendreau / Donna Bull vs Brian Pool / Jill Cutler7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-20vs CTL55/RILEY/RKLost 12
L#1 DoublesWyndi Green / James Turner vs James Younts / Mertha Ratterree4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaige Easley / Kathryn Peebles vs Nancy OConnor / Trey Spong5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPatrick Layden / Gail Harrison vs Mark Ferguson / Helen Russell1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-13vs CTL (W) 3.5M 55 & Over (Simpson)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPaige Easley / Anny Zalesne vs Carmen Goulet / Jim Redick2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Krupa / Lentz Ivey vs Lisa Bronson / Gerald Simpson2-6, 2-6
2026-06-06vs CTL55/Clements/SVCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRon Gendreau / Kathryn Peebles vs Christine Clements / Steven Junis6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Layden / Jennifer Wilson vs James Clements / Mary Wright4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWyndi Green / Will Kuhne vs Tom Tracy / Kim Hale5-7, 4-6
2026-05-30vs CTL55/Lybrand/WRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesWyndi Green / Paige Easley vs Leigh Matthews / Jim Powell3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Green / Janet Krupa vs Kenneth Henry / Janis Murphy4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames Turner / Gail Harrison vs Margaret Price / Thomas Murphy5-7, 4-6
2026-05-16vs CTL55/RILEY/RKWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaige Easley / Wyndi Green vs James Younts / Maxine Fisher3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatrick Layden / Anny Zalesne vs Helen Russell / Michael Tyler6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWendy Dougall / Thomas Dougall vs Edwin Martin Jr / Mertha Ratterree6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-09vs CTL (A) 3.5M 55 & Over (Pool)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Turner / Ron Gendreau vs Kelly Wiseman / Srihari Nelakuditi0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wilson / Will Kuhne vs Susan Poznick / Michael Beam3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Green / Wyndi Green vs Brian Pool / Laurie Pool0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 55 & Over Mixed 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTL (A) 3.5M 55 & Over (Pool)5215614142
2CTL (W) 3.5M 55 & Over (Simpson)5214717160
3CTL55/Clements/SVCC43111023200
4CTL55/RILEY/RK34101127205
5CTL55/Lybrand/WRC2571430213
6CTL55/GREEN/WWD2561535242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Janet Krupa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Kathryn Peebles
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Paige Easley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.42
Ron Gendreau
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Will Kuhne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
James Turner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Wyndi Green
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Anny Zalesne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Patrick Layden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Carol Ivey
published 3.5
3.05
Thomas Dougall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Wendy Dougall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Lentz Ivey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Gail Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Donna Bull
published
Susan Turner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lentz Ivey + Carol Ivey134 matchesnot enough data
Wyndi Green + Paige Easley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Krupa
120W–72L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kathryn Peebles
45W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.48
Paige Easley
55W–58L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Ron Gendreau
54W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
3.42
Will Kuhne
29W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
James Turner
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Wyndi Green
113W–109L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Anny Zalesne
51W–72L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Patrick Layden
130W–136L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Carol Ivey
23W–42L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Thomas Dougall
43W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.05
Wendy Dougall
28W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Lentz Ivey
12W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
Gail Harrison
137W–141L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Donna Bull
34W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Turner
17W–35L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.