Teams

GATA 3.0M 55 & Over (Capitani)

USTA GATA ADULT 55 & OVER · 3.0 55 & Over Men

7 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-22vs GATA/55/SCHLUETER/SLVWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Capitani / Keith Jones vs Michael Capitani / Steven Locke1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Fuchs / Ken Ballard vs Glenn Heffner / Kent Holden1-0
2026-03-15vs GATA/55/SCHLUETER/SLVWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Capitani / Steve Ostrovsky vs Michael Capitani / Glenn Heffner0-1
W#2 DoublesKord Willis / Ted Mawla vs Kent Holden / Scott Breach0-1
2026-03-08vs GATA/55/SCHLUETER/SLVWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobert Hahn / Keith Jones vs Douglas Sappenfield / Kent Holden6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelly Price / Kord Willis vs Robert Tudor / Steven Locke6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Fuchs / Ken Ballard vs Scott Breach / Hugh Vanderford5-5
2026-03-01vs GATA/55/SCHLUETER/SLVWon 21
W#1 DoublesSteve Ostrovsky / Ted Mawla vs Dave Schlueter / Douglas Sappenfield5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Fuchs / Robert Hahn vs Hugh Vanderford / Kent Holden6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Price / Ken Ballard vs Steven Locke / Scott Breach6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-22vs GATA/55/SCHLUETER/SLVWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobert Hahn / Kelly Price vs Robert Tudor / Kent Holden6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKeith Jones / Kord Willis vs Hugh Vanderford / Glenn Heffner7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTed Mawla / Steve Ostrovsky vs Edward Petruska / Michael Capitani6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 55 & Over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GATA 3.0M 55 & Over (Capitani)50141354
2GATA/55/SCHLUETER/SLV0511429179

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
John Fuchs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Ken Ballard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Robert Hahn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Ted Mawla
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Steve Ostrovsky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Kord Willis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Capitani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Fuchs
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
Ken Ballard
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Robert Hahn
6W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Ted Mawla
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
2.58
Steve Ostrovsky
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
Kord Willis
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
Robert Capitani
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.