Teams

9 Sal's Berries - Tornabene

2025 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.31 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-14vs 12 MRTC Battery Park 3.5 HawleyWon 32
W#1 DoublesCatherine Baldridge / Allison Krumpe vs Ginny Boland / Xuemin Ginsberg6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBecky McNeer vs Suzanne Ley6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Means / Donna Jamison vs Joy Nyman / Elizabeth Clark6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCathy Keith / Avery Horgan vs Francesca Purcell / Christie Wisotzki6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesMelissa Brunner-Brown / Sania Marcoccia vs Jennifer Carlin / Louise McCool0-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesAllison Krumpe / Mandy Tornabene vs Irene Quilez / Dawn MacHonis6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesBeth Phipps vs Robin Griffith6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKarin Speizer / Donna Jamison vs Rebecca Cassilly / Deanne Ralston6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVinola Barnes / Robin Sorensen vs Katy Bassler / Lisa Aaron3-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesAvery Horgan / Susan Gregory vs Mari Litz / Lori Strobl4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Becky McNeer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Catherine Baldridge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Mandy Tornabene
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Allison Krumpe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Karin Speizer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Beth Phipps
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Donna Jamison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Robin Sorensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Melissa Brunner-Brown
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Andrea Hill
published 3
3.04
Stacey Piotrowski
published
2.88
Tracy Diel
published
2.86
Kimberly Means
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Avery Horgan
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Cathy Keith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Sania Marcoccia
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Gregory
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Vinola Barnes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky McNeer + Donna Jamison6160% games+11.7% vs expected
Allison Krumpe + Catherine Baldridge5159% games+9.7% vs expected
Stacey Piotrowski + Melissa Brunner-Brown224 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Brunner-Brown + Donna Jamison134 matchesnot enough data
Becky McNeer + Catherine Baldridge033 matchesnot enough data
Allison Krumpe + Mandy Tornabene213 matchesnot enough data
Mandy Tornabene + Catherine Baldridge303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Becky McNeer
30W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Catherine Baldridge
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Mandy Tornabene
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Allison Krumpe
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
Karin Speizer
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Beth Phipps
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Donna Jamison
20W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Robin Sorensen
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Melissa Brunner-Brown
11W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Andrea Hill
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.05
Stacey Piotrowski
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Tracy Diel
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.88
Kimberly Means
9W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Avery Horgan
10W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Cathy Keith
8W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
Sania Marcoccia
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Gregory
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vinola Barnes
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.