Teams

Hall of Framers: Genesis

2023 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-03vs Smart Aces: GenesisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChris David / Albert Lu vs Rocky Cowan / Tony Toigo6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Stinnett / Jerry McKeen vs Mark Richards / Jason Wingert3-6, 4-6
2023-05-13vs Smart Aces: GenesisWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlbert Lu / Jerry McKeen vs Mark Richards / Rob Newberry6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLee Christie vs Rocky Cowan6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-28vs Smart Aces: GenesisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMike Teachout / Lee Christie vs Jason Wingert / Tony Toigo6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlbert Lu / Robert Stinnett vs Rob Newberry / Rocky Cowan6-4, 6-2
2023-04-14vs Smart Aces: GenesisLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlbert Lu / Mike Teachout vs Jody Lovan / Mark Richards5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLee Christie / Robert Stinnett vs Jason Wingert / Rob Newberry4-6, 3-6
2023-03-26vs Smart Aces: GenesisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlbert Lu / Lee Christie vs Ryan Mann / Jason Wingert6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChris David / Andrew Pedersen vs Mark Richards / Tony Toigo2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smart Aces: Genesis328717141
2Hall of Framers: Genesis236919140

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Lee Christie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Albert Lu
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Andrew Pedersen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Chris David
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.54
Jerry McKeen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Mike Teachout
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Robert Stinnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Blume
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Stinnett + Albert Lu2347% games−0.0% vs expected
Jerry McKeen + Lee Christie213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lee Christie
23W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Albert Lu
15W–15L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Andrew Pedersen
2W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3
Chris David
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.56
Jerry McKeen
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
Mike Teachout
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.49
Robert Stinnett
5W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
2.33
Mark Blume
19W–11L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.