Teams

FCC Tie Breakers-Blakemore

2024 Fredericksburg Combo Mixed · Fredericksburg Combo Mixed 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-14vs Battlefield Ballbuster-ButtonLost 12
L#1 DoublesLiz Walsh / Jeff Singley vs Linda Catullo / Dusten Rees6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJamie Stokes / Jordan Wadkins vs Tara Ford / Maurice Cornejo4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Wadkins / Jonathan Marcus vs Susan Button / Carl Kabbe6-3, 6-0
2024-11-02vs Battlefield Ballbuster-ButtonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLiz Walsh / Jeff Singley vs Dalyah Ronzio / Dale Rogers7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJamie Stokes / Andy Withers vs Linda Catullo / Chuck Hulsey7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-24vs Battlefield Ballbuster-ButtonWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Singley / Jamie Stokes vs Tara Ford / Chuck Hulsey6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJonathan Marcus / Rachel Wadkins vs Tricia Hulsey / Carl Kabbe6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Jonathan Marcus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Jamie Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Megan Roberge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Karen Franklin
published
2.91
Linda Blakemore
published
2.75
Charles Hyde
published 3
Andy Withers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jeff Singley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jordan Wadkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Liz Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Wadkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Marcus
11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Jamie Stokes
18W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
Megan Roberge
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
Karen Franklin
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Linda Blakemore
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Charles Hyde
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
2.5
Andy Withers
0W–1L career · type M · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jeff Singley
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jordan Wadkins
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Liz Walsh
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachel Wadkins
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.