Teams

SS-H TEAL

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs HW BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesLisa McCausland / Allison Rampley vs Katie Dulik / Melissa Long5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesErica Palmer vs Katie Gelman6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJeni Anderson / Molly Svendsen vs Kristin Martini / Johanna Tiwari7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAbby Gilbertson / Kay Langman vs Stephanie Auth / Natalie Morris5-7, 4-6
2026-07-06vs KC-RH REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesValerie Peterson / Allison Rampley vs Sarah Bush / Lay Chan3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAbby Gilbertson vs Zenta Pakulis0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa McCausland / Kay Langman vs Erin Mason / Susan Pine4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesErica Palmer / Molly Svendsen vs Christa Williams / Leslie Hull4-6, 6-7
2026-06-29vs HRCA-N GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesErica Palmer / Allison Rampley vs Ruth Dullea / Kari Samborski0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHeidi Custer vs Tracy Corbett4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Svendsen / Jeni Anderson vs Annie Kim / Krista Henry6-1, 6-3
2026-06-22vs LTFC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesSarah Mesner / Heidi Custer vs Amy DiOrio / Heather Prier4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesValerie Peterson vs Jennifer DeLurgio0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Svendsen / Lisa McCausland vs Debbie Murphy / Carol Wood1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesErica Palmer / Kay Langman vs Shelley Maloney / Christina Jordan3-6, 4-6
2026-06-15vs SS-LGT REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesHeidi Custer / Lisa McCausland vs Jenna Sellers / Monica Reidelbach6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAbby Gilbertson vs Kirstin Amidon6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesValerie Peterson / Allison Rampley vs Anne Casson / Laura Yetzer6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeni Anderson / Kay Langman vs Zhanna Jackson / Kelly Mccusker7-6, 6-3
2026-06-08vs KC-CC NAVYLost 13
W#1 DoublesSarah Mesner / Heidi Custer vs Nelisha Firestone / Judy Delzell6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesValerie Peterson vs Ashley Barto7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMolly Svendsen / Allison Rampley vs Sarah Carlson / Christine McElhinney1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesErica Palmer / Jeni Anderson vs Lori Moinet / Rachel Osborne4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-01vs WC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesAllison Rampley / Lisa McCausland vs Lisa Arthur / Erin Herman6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesHeidi Custer vs Katherine Hurley6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMolly Svendsen / Jeni Anderson vs Lisa Knurek / SUSAN MORAVEK6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Mesner / Erica Palmer vs Laura Ream / Marni Shwartz6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Heidi Custer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.81
Allison Rampley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Sarah Mesner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Valerie Peterson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.66
Jeni Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Molly Svendsen
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.64
Lisa McCausland
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.58
Erica Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.50
Abby Gilbertson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.19
Kay Langman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa McCausland + Heidi Custer9956% games+3.0% vs expected
Jeni Anderson + Molly Svendsen6949% games−3.8% vs expected
Heidi Custer + Sarah Mesner3649% games−7.0% vs expected
Allison Rampley + Valerie Peterson3253% gamesnot enough data
Abby Gilbertson + Kay Langman033 matchesnot enough data
Lisa McCausland + Jeni Anderson213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa McCausland + Allison Rampley213 matchesnot enough data
Jeni Anderson + Kay Langman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Heidi Custer
67W–60L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Allison Rampley
11W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Sarah Mesner
24W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Valerie Peterson
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Jeni Anderson
11W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Molly Svendsen
12W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Lisa McCausland
50W–72L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Erica Palmer
16W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%29%71%
2.58
3
Abby Gilbertson
4W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Kay Langman
22W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.