Teams

Team 3 Love & Learn Tennis

2025 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 2.94 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-30vs Team 6 WGCC HitmenWon 30
W#1 DoublesShane Haley / Michael Brandon vs Sean Epstein / Jay Ghazal6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlberto Zuazo / Anthony Tr vs Rod Volz / Michael Poth6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesIlya Shapiro / Michele Tavani vs Brett Lambo / Toby Chun6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Andre Mallqui
published 3
3.12
Shannon Barnes
published
3.01
Shane Haley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Michael Brandon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Johnathan Missner
published
2.97
Ilya Shapiro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Ryan Wang
published
2.82
Alberto Zuazo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Anthony Tr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Charles Penunia
published 3
2.64
Alberto Zapata
published 3
2.64
Alex Huamani
published 3
2.63
Akmal Nasimov
published 3
2.54
Michele Tavani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Amit Athani
published 2.5
Redha Hasan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ilya Shapiro + Johnathan Missner213 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Wang + Andre Mallqui213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andre Mallqui
22W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Shannon Barnes
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
Shane Haley
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Michael Brandon
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Johnathan Missner
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Ilya Shapiro
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Ryan Wang
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
2.88
3
Alberto Zuazo
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Anthony Tr
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Charles Penunia
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Alberto Zapata
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Alex Huamani
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
3
Akmal Nasimov
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Michele Tavani
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
2.5
Amit Athani
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Redha Hasan
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.