Teams

GEPTA/Tri-Level/3.5-4.5W/Calderon

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings5 teams · 2025 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Quevedo/Trilevel/4.5-3.5W4093999
2GEPTA/Tri-Level/3.5-4.5W/Lobato318412106
3GEPTA/Tri-Level/3.5-4.5W/Chivardi135715108
4GEPTA/Tri-Level/3.5-4.5W/Calderon134818124
5GEPTA/Tri-Level/3.5-4.5W/Perches134818136

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Angela Herrera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.00
Claudia Calderon
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
3.88
Alejandra Ostos
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 4
Dolly Ricks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Laura Lama
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mariel Berdeja
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Patricia Dalbin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published
Paula Prado
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Rossana Roacho
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sara Kaltwasser
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Susana Elias
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Veronica Perusquia
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dolly Ricks + Rossana Roacho8261% games+6.7% vs expected
Susana Elias + Sara Kaltwasser5549% games+1.1% vs expected
Angela Herrera + Paula Prado7941% games+0.4% vs expected
Rossana Roacho + Patricia Dalbin37960% games−0.9% vs expected
Susana Elias + Patricia Dalbin5258% games−3.7% vs expected
Angela Herrera + Claudia Calderon3350% gamesnot enough data
Paula Prado + Claudia Calderon1543% gamesnot enough data
Susana Elias + Claudia Calderon2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angela Herrera
60W–52L career · 20 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Claudia Calderon
41W–57L career · 28 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Alejandra Ostos
51W–13L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Dolly Ricks
60W–73L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Lama
20W–17L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariel Berdeja
21W–19L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Dalbin
99W–72L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Prado
42W–46L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rossana Roacho
123W–115L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Kaltwasser
83W–47L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susana Elias
108W–65L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Veronica Perusquia
20W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.