Teams

Hold-credit-exp-8/1/26

Winter Adult 40 & Over WeekDAY · HOLD

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for HOLD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Caroline Cardno
published 3.5
3.07
Holly Bunnell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Olivia Devin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Cathy Hofer
published 3.5
2.86
Joleen Goronkin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Brenda Bernal
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Maria Masters
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.61
Maggie Bourque
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Liza Coldewey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Danielle Grant
published
Rhonda Worsham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maggie Bourque + Maria Masters4350% gamesnot enough data
Brenda Bernal + Maria Masters213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Cardno
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Holly Bunnell
55W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Olivia Devin
18W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Cathy Hofer
5W–20L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
Joleen Goronkin
51W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Brenda Bernal
38W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Maria Masters
32W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Maggie Bourque
28W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Liza Coldewey
18W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Danielle Grant
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhonda Worsham
44W–40L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.