Teams

IE-Play It Forward-CL-Andrea Bohn

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 SinglesRhianna Thompson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Cardoza / Saleshnie Sukhram vs Tammy Kennedy / Nancy Contreras2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSheila Walkington / Erin Furlong vs Karin Pace / Kimberly Geske6-3, 6-3
2022-06-04vs IE-CCCC-Sesilie Kay/Amy TaylorWon 20
W#1 DoublesSaleshnie Sukhram / Rhonda Arendt vs Sesilie Kay / Amy Taylor2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRhianna Thompson vs Sara Aschmann6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesSaleshnie Sukhram / Rhonda Arendt vs Leslie Martin / Sue Pruitt6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMeredith Kielty / Rhianna Thompson vs Patricia Quinn / Michele Lawrence6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-05-11vs IE-LLW-MTC-Jeanne ShelterLost 02
L#2 DoublesSaleshnie Sukhram / Sheila Walkington vs Joan Greene / Tara MacHarg6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrea Bohn / Rhianna Thompson vs Jeanne Shelter / Heather Toth6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-30vs IE-TCC-Ellen YarterWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhianna Thompson / Andrea Bohn vs Marie Honda / Laurel Eriksen6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSheila Walkington / Saleshnie Sukhram vs Silvia Vich / Kitty Myers7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesErin Furlong vs Devan Olfman3-6, 2-6
2022-04-16vs IE-VMHS-Joanne HarnedSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSaleshnie Sukhram vs Juliet Fisher2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRhianna Thompson / Valorie Gambina vs Nath Sayasane / April Mays6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-02vs IE-APTC-Cleo CollierWon 20
W#1 SinglesRhianna Thompson vs Cleo Collier7-5, 4-4
W#2 DoublesSaleshnie Sukhram / Sheila Walkington vs Connie DeLong / Jane Magro6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Rhianna Thompson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.52
Saleshnie Sukhram
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.31
Erin Furlong
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Rhonda Arendt
published
2.77
Danette Conlin
published 3
2.69
Tina Maslach
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rhianna Thompson
137W–91L career · 8 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Saleshnie Sukhram
114W–80L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Erin Furlong
49W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Rhonda Arendt
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Danette Conlin
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Elizabeth Cardoza
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
Tina Maslach
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.