Teams

Watson/LF

2024 TUL ADULT 18 & Over Day League · 2.5 WOMEN-DAY

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-03-15vs Hendrix/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesTami Foust / Lisa Silvestri vs Erin Rich / Brooke Meehan1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLeah Maples vs Heather Elliott3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Watson / Tiffany Osborne vs Katy Spangler / Nicole McDaniel6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-03-12vs Howard/CRLost 12
L#1 DoublesTiffany Osborne / Leah Maples vs Heather Conklin / Diane Mareburger2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Chadwick vs Heather Smith2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanielle Watson / Crystal Wing vs Val Hansen / Margaret Hosier7-6, 6-2
2024-03-01vs Kirkpatrick/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeah Maples / Julie Chadwick vs Bonnie Presley / Heather Denove7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Auer vs Olivia Bliss6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMaghin Abernathy / Tiffany Osborne vs Missy Torgerson / Kristen Maronek2-6, 2-6
2023-11-17vs Wills/TTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesTami Foust / Lisa Silvestri vs Edith Coen / Alexis Gonzales3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLeah Maples vs Tina Nikel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDanielle Watson / Tiffany Osborne vs Lauren Hunt / Reagan Welch2-6, 4-6
2023-11-10vs Swiggett DAY/LFLost 12
W#1 DoublesDanielle Watson / Julie Chadwick vs Chelsy Wilson / Reagan Reininger6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCrystal Wing vs Nicole Swiggett7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel McAlpin / Sarah Dent vs Megan Carpenter / Allison Carr0-6, 1-6
2023-11-06vs Payne/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesTiffany Osborne / Lisa Silvestri vs Hannah Payne / Miranda Grimes6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCrystal Wing vs Sandie Barns6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeah Maples / Hillary Myers vs Lindsay Beard / Caitlin Chappell3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-11-03vs Gillespie/SHWon 30
W#1 DoublesCrystal Wing / Tiffany Osborne vs Alise Taylor / Maggie Yar6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Auer vs Stephanie Watling6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Silvestri / Tami Foust vs Laura Barnes / Erica Curran6-2, 6-3
2023-10-13vs Smith/ISWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaghin Abernathy / Crystal Wing vs Kay Gulledge / Guylene Dooman7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJulie Chadwick vs Raegen Smith6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel McAlpin / Hillary Myers vs Amy Barnes / Nancy Park5-7, 5-7
2023-10-06vs Evans/ISLost 12
L#1 DoublesTami Foust / Leah Maples vs Suzanne Rackleff / Kathryn Jessogne0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Auer vs Lindsey Poole6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSarah Dent / Rachel McAlpin vs Jennifer Mason / Haddi Nunley6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-09-29vs TUL DAY: Quick/GRLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Chadwick / Maghin Abernathy vs Anna Quick / Jill Croka0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLeah Maples vs Maddie Biram1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHillary Myers / Rachel McAlpin vs Lisa Coulter / Vivian Rogers1-6, 0-6
2023-09-14vs Garcia/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Silvestri / Leah Maples vs Angela Garcia / Kelly Hunt2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Auer vs Katie Raper-Cavener7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSarah Dent / Tiffany Osborne vs Kristine Taylor / Angela Yelich3-6, 4-6
2023-09-08vs Wyatt/SHLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaghin Abernathy / Danielle Watson vs Jennifer Potts / Kelly Wilkerson0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Chadwick vs Sarah Garrow3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTami Foust / Tiffany Osborne vs Ashwini Vaidya / Hilliary Lenhart4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 2.5 WOMEN-DAY
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TUL DAY: Quick/GR1203429156
2Swiggett DAY/LF10227925250
3Howard/CR93221433284
4Wyatt/SH75201635280
5Wills/TTC66211536290
6Hendrix/LF66181841326
7Kirkpatrick/LF57171945325
8Garcia/LF48122451362
9Gillespie/SH48122453366
10Watson/LF39122451360
11Payne/LF11192757389
12Fondren/LF000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.63
Leah Maples
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
2.44
Julie Chadwick
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
2.44
Crystal Wing
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.32
Tiffany Osborne
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Danielle Watson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.24
Lisa Silvestri
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.17
Jennifer Auer
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
1.91
Tami Foust
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Hillary Myers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Maghin Abernathy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rachel McAlpin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Dent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Watson + Crystal Wing3446% games+6.2% vs expected
Crystal Wing + Julie Chadwick3643% games−1.5% vs expected
Tami Foust + Tiffany Osborne2440% games−7.3% vs expected
Tami Foust + Lisa Silvestri2835% games−10.6% vs expected
Danielle Watson + Julie Chadwick4639% games−11.6% vs expected
Maghin Abernathy + Crystal Wing2346% gamesnot enough data
Maghin Abernathy + Julie Chadwick2345% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Auer + Crystal Wing314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah Maples
26W–18L career · 8 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Julie Chadwick
33W–42L career · 11 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.44
3
Crystal Wing
22W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.44
Tiffany Osborne
20W–48L career · 8 lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Danielle Watson
18W–35L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Silvestri
25W–45L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.24
Jennifer Auer
31W–44L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.17
Tami Foust
25W–88L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Hillary Myers
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maghin Abernathy
8W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachel McAlpin
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Dent
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.