Teams

LA-LLW-Queen Anne-William Levenberg

2022 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Men 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-19vs LA - Canyon CoyotesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Mayer / Braxton Sato vs Ed Premetz / Brandon Wig6-1, 6-1
2022-11-13vs LA - LATCWon 10
W#1 DoublesBraxton Sato / David Mayer vs John Bauman / AJ Dickerson6-3, 6-3
2022-11-05vs LA - Ace DragonWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Mayer / Braxton Sato vs Raymond Bertrand / Michael Zarnitsa6-2, 6-2
2022-10-30vs LA - Ball BustersWon 10
W#1 DoublesBraxton Sato / David Mayer vs Eric Brenner / Peter Bergren7-5, 6-4
2022-10-29vs LA - Court JusticeWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Mayer / Braxton Sato vs George Moore / David Poyourow6-3, 6-3
2022-10-22vs LA - Team AsheWon 10
W#1 DoublesErik Levenberg / David Mayer vs Justin Scovil / Richard Taylor6-0, 6-0
2022-10-09vs LA - MountainGateWon 10
W#1 DoublesBraxton Sato / David Mayer vs Glenn Kopelson / Brent Tran6-2, 6-4
2022-10-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesBraxton Sato / David Mayer vs Miller Klitsner / William Wharton6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
David Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Braxton Sato
published 4
3.52
ZACH FISHBAIN
published
3.51
Ray Li
published
3.16
Marc Burkow
published
3.00
Jeff Lorch
published
TOMAS LOPEZ
published
William Levenberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Braxton Sato + David Mayer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Mayer
106W–67L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Braxton Sato
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
ZACH FISHBAIN
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
Ray Li
23W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
Marc Burkow
8W–18L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
3
Cinderella Gatcheco
49W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00
Jeff Lorch
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
TOMAS LOPEZ
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
William Levenberg
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.