Teams

Racq Pacq

2025 Corpus Christi 55 & Over USTA League · Ladies 8.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-18vs CCCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnita Moore / Stephanie Hastings vs Penny Maingot / Loyce Woods7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Thompson / Nancy Barrera vs Tracey Barre / Lynne Lassig6-0, 6-3
2025-02-11vs Sets on the BeachWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Thompson / Jane Huston vs Donna Jackson / Susan Temple6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnita Moore / Stephanie Hastings vs Janet Knesek / Theresa Swirenko6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJonna Davidson / Nancy Barrera vs Ginger Martin / Lisa Garcia3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-01vs Sets on the BeachLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Hastings / Nancy Barrera vs Donna Jackson / Susan Temple5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStacy Grover / Anita Moore vs Ginger Martin / Mary Lupe Arana6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJonna Davidson / Michelle Thompson vs Janet Knesek / Theresa Swirenko4-6, 3-6
2025-01-28vs CCCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJonna Davidson / Nancy Barrera vs Penny Maingot / Loyce Woods6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephanie Hastings / Marsai Bass vs Tracey Barre / Tracy Fraiche5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStacy Grover / Anita Moore vs Laura Hunter / Tonya May6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Nancy Barrera
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.80
Anita Moore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Stephanie Hastings
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Jonna Davidson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Stacy Grover
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Jane Huston
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Marsai Bass
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Moore + Stephanie Hastings17660% games+2.0% vs expected
Marsai Bass + Jonna Davidson3255% games−0.8% vs expected
Anita Moore + Stacy Grover404 matchesnot enough data
Marsai Bass + Jane Huston314 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Hastings + Jonna Davidson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Barrera
34W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Anita Moore
36W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Stephanie Hastings
42W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Jonna Davidson
40W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Stacy Grover
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Jane Huston
56W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
Marsai Bass
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.