Teams

St.Wingo18A3.5

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-27vs Ja.Mellott18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesJack Moore / Kyle Vumbaco vs Alex Piasecki / Benjamin Katz2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStan Wingo / West Ludwig vs Ken Glanville / Frederick Holding1-6, 4-6
2025-04-06Won 20
W#2 SinglesKyle Vumbaco vs Graham Day6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesWest Ludwig / Jason Emanuel vs Robb Adams / Larry Moye7-5, 6-3
2025-03-30vs Ed.Perkins18ALost 01
L#2 DoublesJason Emanuel / Kyle Vumbaco vs Willie Griffin / Bryan Lowrance3-6, 6-7
2025-03-23vs Mi.Elstob18AWon 30
W#2 DoublesStan Wingo / Wes Dyke - (DQ) vs Philip Robertson / Rob Sellick6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKyle Vumbaco vs Mike Elstob6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Ball / Jason Emanuel vs Ken Haney / Nathan Daigle6-3, 6-3
2025-03-22vs Ma.Durbin18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Pollack / Wes Dyke - (DQ) vs Mike Kaelin / Mike Uhland2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesKyle Vumbaco vs Hamilton Garvey6-3, 6-3
2025-03-09vs Ev.Fultz18ALost 12
W#1 DoublesStan Wingo / Wes Dyke - (DQ) vs Nicholas Ballew / Wes Bradshaw6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKyle Vumbaco vs David Roberts7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJason Emanuel / Michael Ball vs Evan Fultz / Steve Crell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Wes Dyke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Stan Wingo
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Jeffrey Pollack
published
3.25
Usman Ahmad
published
3.24
West Ludwig
published
3.18
Jason Emanuel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.08
Nathan Pool
published
2.92
Dylan Miller
published
2.92
Kyle Vumbaco
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.87
Michael Ball
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stan Wingo + Nathan Pool4256% gamesnot enough data
Jason Emanuel + Kyle Vumbaco3262% gamesnot enough data
West Ludwig + Jeffrey Pollack134 matchesnot enough data
Usman Ahmad + Dylan Miller033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Wes Dyke
17W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Stan Wingo
108W–95L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Jeffrey Pollack
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.31
Usman Ahmad
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
West Ludwig
8W–20L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
3
Jason Emanuel
33W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Nathan Pool
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Dylan Miller
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Kyle Vumbaco
24W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
2.92
Michael Ball
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.