Teams

RCC RED

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-04vs BCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesDanielle Witte / Katrina Matthews vs Catherine Ruelas / Paige Walker2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTessa Clement vs Alana Malone1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKylie McBride / Katie Dittmer vs Marissa Fahrbach / Cyndy McClung6-4, 6-1
2024-08-28vs NJ NAVYWon 20
W#1 SinglesKatie Dittmer vs Jacqueline Marquis6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Stuckemeyer / Tessa Clement vs Shirley Willard / Sarah Sassler4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-21vs TTA BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Odegaard / Danielle Witte vs Tanya Jones / Ashlee Paulson6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTessa Clement / Christina Sjolin vs Bryce Larson / Jennifer Sanchez6-1, 6-1
2024-08-14vs BRMST ORANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatie Dittmer / Barbara Cole vs Stephanie Haskett / Julia Occhuizzo6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDanielle Witte / Tessa Clement vs Lindsay Roberts / Tracey Perry6-7, 6-7
2024-07-31vs NJ GOLDWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Dittmer / Elizabeth Odegaard vs Sheri Gann / Marcie Carvalho6-1, 6-0
2024-07-24vs CVTA REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesTessa Clement / Kylie McBride vs Laura Seredinski / Ana Jaffe6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDanielle Witte vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKatie Dittmer / Barbara Cole vs Jo Kim / Kim Huss6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Katie Dittmer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.60
Barbara Cole
published 3
2.60
Elizabeth Odegaard
published
2.55
Tessa Clement
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.48
Danielle Witte
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.42
Kylie McBride
published
Christina Sjolin
published 2.5
2.21
Katrina Matthews
published
2.09
Karen Stuckemeyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tessa Clement + Kylie McBride5258% games+2.5% vs expected
Danielle Witte + Elizabeth Odegaard213 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Cole + Kylie McBride123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Katie Dittmer
34W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Barbara Cole
20W–9L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.60
Elizabeth Odegaard
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
Tessa Clement
27W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Danielle Witte
54W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
Kylie McBride
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.42
2.5
Christina Sjolin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katrina Matthews
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.21
Karen Stuckemeyer
14W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.