Teams

Helton

Adult 18 & Over League · Adult 18 & Over 4.0M

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-06vs If Not Now, Then When?Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJonathon Rittenhouse / Will Burkes vs Brent McCasland / Nicolas Diaz0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHarold Lamm / Jeff Helton vs Matthew Counts / David Reyes3-6, 3-6
2026-04-22vs McDuffieLost 02
L#1 DoublesWill Burkes / Jonathon Rittenhouse vs Binh Vu / Chase Bruton3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJeff Helton / Harold Lamm vs Sol Mayer / Sullivan Henson3-6, 2-6
2026-04-15vs If Not Now, Then When?Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Helton / Will Burkes vs Dustin Haire / Jay Orr6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-04-01vs McDuffieLost 03
L#1 DoublesWill Burkes / Jonathon Rittenhouse vs Morgan Wood / Davis Calhoun5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Helton / Jake Powers vs Sol Mayer / Sullivan Henson2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHarold Lamm / David Sturgeon vs Brent Wilcox Sr / Binh Vu4-6, 2-6
2026-03-25vs If Not Now, Then When?Split 11
W#1 DoublesJeff Helton / Will Burkes vs Brent McCasland / Jose Reyes7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesHarold Lamm / David Sturgeon vs Dustin Haire / Jay Orr1-6, 2-6
2026-03-11vs MartinezSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJonathon Rittenhouse / Will Burkes vs Jacob Maenius / Daniel Sosa2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHarold Lamm / Jeff Helton vs Kolby Thomas / Jon Cauthorn6-4, 6-1
2026-03-04vs McDuffieLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeff Helton / Jonathon Rittenhouse vs Binh Vu / Morgan Wood6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHarold Lamm / David Sturgeon vs Sol Mayer / Chase Bruton3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Jeff Helton
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.61
Harold Lamm
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.56
Jonathon Rittenhouse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Will Burkes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Alvin Smith
usually #1 Singles 92%, also #3 Doubles 8% · published 3.5
3.43
David Sturgeon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.10
Cecil Ross
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Sturgeon + Harold Lamm101048% games+1.2% vs expected
David Sturgeon + Cecil Ross224 matchesnot enough data
Harold Lamm + Jeff Helton134 matchesnot enough data
Jonathon Rittenhouse + Will Burkes044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Helton
28W–22L career · 7 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Harold Lamm
31W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
Jonathon Rittenhouse
22W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Will Burkes
6W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Alvin Smith
26W–26L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
4
David Sturgeon
40W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Cecil Ross
48W–70L career · 9 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.