← Teams

MAC-Harrington

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.19 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Christin Harrington
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
—
Emma Scherzer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Tracey Forrest
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.86
Jane Nearn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Anne Mangan
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published 3
2.71
Elizabeth Large
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Kelly Letourneau
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.43
Susan Sienko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-03-25Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesNancy Yen Shipley / Kelly Letourneau vs Janet Hummel / Saahiti Penigalapati4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristin Harrington / Natalie Mesnier vs Minnie Bautista / Sally Chen6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesEmma Scherzer vs Lori Farrell6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarcy Patton / Tracey Forrest vs Ada Chang / Brittany Foran6-1, 6-0
2023-03-19Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAnna Ringelberg / Emma Scherzer vs Minnie Bautista / Janet Hummel6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesChristin Harrington vs Melissa Tom6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKelly Letourneau vs Ada Chang6-0, 6-0
2023-02-25Lost 1–3
L#1 SinglesTracey Forrest vs Lilie Matia6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMolly Briscoe / Kelly Letourneau vs Jennifer Johnson / Valerie Regan6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChristin Harrington vs Minda Garvens6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJane Nearn / Sarah Schubert vs Christine Egan / Barbara Holdt6-1, 6-3
2023-02-19Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesSusan Sienko / Heidi Cronn vs Teresa Darling / Maryann Velez6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKelly Letourneau vs Mera Cosgrove6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnne Mangan / Jane Nearn vs Deborah Self / Robin Burak6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Large / Sarah Schubert vs Amy Hicks / Molly Wilson6-3, 6-4
2023-02-04Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesChristin Harrington / Susan Sienko vs Danira Bilanovic / Robin Walker3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmma Scherzer vs Cynthia Novac-Yu6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Large / Sarah Schubert vs Sarah Shin / Jenica Susi6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJane Nearn / Marcy Patton vs Liz Theeuws / Tonya Robson6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-21Lost 1–3
L#1 SinglesTracey Forrest vs Kerri Patrick6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusan Sienko / Stephanie Mathews vs Linnette Donohue / Autumn Bunch6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesEmma Scherzer vs Andrea Hobi6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Large / Emily Jones vs Rhonda Baker / Ivy Lane6-2, 6-1
2023-01-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesEmma Scherzer / Anna Ringelberg vs Penny Luong / Cindy Bennett7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesChristin Harrington vs Lei Ma6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusan Sienko / Stephanie Mathews vs Mai-Anh Nguyen / Joyce Swift6-4, 7-6
2023-01-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesEmma Scherzer / Anna Ringelberg vs Annette Morrison / Ali Waterman6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesTracey Forrest vs Sydney Smith7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChristin Harrington / Jane Nearn vs Nicole Kennely / Erin Dineen6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Christin Harrington
81W–35L career
0%65%35%
3.56
3.5
Emma Scherzer
21W–6L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Tracey Forrest
16W–14L career · type A
47%53%0%
2.95
3
Jane Nearn
29W–23L career
0%95%5%
2.86
3
Anne Mangan
62W–74L career
6%91%4%
2.75
3
Elizabeth Large
19W–48L career
3%97%0%
2.71
3
Kelly Letourneau
15W–19L career
10%89%0%
2.64
3
Susan Sienko
28W–77L career · type A
52%48%0%
2.43

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.