Teams

BC-AltaVista/SondeeWolff

2022 Adult 40 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Kate Kim
published
Irina Goedemans
published 3.5
3.21
Sondee Wolff
published
3.19
Amy Eastman
published 3.5
3.16
Heidi Linscomb
published 3.5
3.11
Kathryn Scandaliato
published
3.10
Joyce Choi
published
3.04
Kay Patel
published
2.95
Veronica Deutsch
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Anna Mendoza
published 3
2.74
Maggie Vaughan
published
2.59
Aryanna Afshar
published 3
Lori Daniels
published
Lynn Attig
published
Marian Stavros
published
Melissa Villanueva
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sondee Wolff + Kathryn Scandaliato033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Kim
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Irina Goedemans
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sondee Wolff
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Amy Eastman
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Heidi Linscomb
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Kathryn Scandaliato
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Joyce Choi
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Kay Patel
46W–47L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Veronica Deutsch
44W–94L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Anna Mendoza
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maggie Vaughan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
2.74
3
Aryanna Afshar
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
Lori Daniels
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynn Attig
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marian Stavros
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Villanueva
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.