← Teams

LRC-Litch/Fynboe

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Charlie Hyde
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Pete Addison
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results5 ties
2024-06-06Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesPete Addison / Chris Fynboe vs Jeff Engle / Drake Nicholson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-03Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesCharlie Hyde / Paul Whittaker vs Kurt Bethman / John Shelton6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPete Addison / Thomas Reber vs Drake Nicholson / Thomas Henderson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-09Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesCharlie Hyde / Paul Whittaker vs Kurt Bethman / Michael Huffman6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPete Addison / Chris Fynboe vs Jeff Engle / Gerald Nelson6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-26Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesCharlie Hyde / Thomas Reber vs Thomas Henderson / Darrel Leimback6-4, 6-1
2024-04-20Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesPaul Whittaker / Charlie Hyde vs Kurt Bethman / John Shelton6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRandy Litch / Pete Addison vs Michael Huffman / Gerald Nelson6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Charlie Hyde
28W–31L career
4%95%1%
3.22
3.5
Pete Addison
77W–96L career
2%98%0%
3.21

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.