← Teams

N OR-WHRC-Burlingame

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.07 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Octavian Tudorache
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Steven Grant
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.03
Scott Dickinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
DeWayne Ledbetter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Jonathan Guinn
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
—
Alex Delarosa
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Dave Hardman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
—
Robert Burlingame
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results10 ties
2023-06-24Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJonathan Guinn / Dave Hardman vs Daniel Salinas / Barron Willis6-2, 6-4
2023-06-24Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesDave Hardman / Robert Ellis vs Nick DiMartino / Mark Knoll6-0, 6-0
2023-06-23Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesJonathan Guinn / Robert Burlingame vs Monte Gonzales / Scott Quinn6-2, 6-3
2022-11-20Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDeWayne Ledbetter / Scott Dickinson vs Kerry Sweet / Dave Gillard3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJonathan Guinn / Octavian Tudorache vs William Place / Rufus Timberlake6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRobert Crawford / Dave Hardman vs James North / Patrick Priest6-0, 6-0
2022-11-06Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesScott Dickinson / Octavian Tudorache vs James Prouty / Yongping Liu6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSteven Grant / William B Harrison vs Keibun Hayashi / Tom Finnerty7-5, 6-2
2022-10-30Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesScott Dickinson / Alex Delarosa vs Ed de la Fuente / William Seidl6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDave Hardman / Robert Ellis vs David Prescott / Paul Preston6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRobert Burlingame / William B Harrison vs Paul Best / Mark Darienzo1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-21Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesDeWayne Ledbetter / Scott Dickinson vs Lee Anderson / Stephen Galati6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSteven Grant / Alex Delarosa vs Dave Sato / Wesley Eader6-1, 6-4
2022-10-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDavid Huang / Octavian Tudorache vs Douglas Bennett / George Scott6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSteven Grant / DeWayne Ledbetter vs Norman Langston / Richard Nobleman6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJonathan Guinn / Alex Delarosa vs Lee Kriebaum / Terrence Trausch6-3, 6-1
2022-10-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRobert Burlingame / Octavian Tudorache vs Dirk Jacobs / Monte Gonzales6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDave Hardman / Steven Grant vs Robert Hesslink / Ryan Owens6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDeWayne Ledbetter / David Huang vs Scott Quinn / Winston Young6-4, 7-5
2022-09-24Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesOctavian Tudorache / Robert Crawford vs Jeffrey Bayless / Paul Garrahan6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Huang / Jonathan Guinn vs Brian Hefele / Kip Stevenson7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Octavian Tudorache
66W–52L career
2%98%0%
3.20
3
Steven Grant
92W–60L career
0%44%56%
3.13
3
Scott Dickinson
106W–81L career · type A
0%76%24%
3.03
3
DeWayne Ledbetter
51W–55L career
2%79%19%
2.92
3
Jonathan Guinn
45W–76L career
1%98%1%
2.76
3
Alex Delarosa
16W–26L career
not enough data
—
3
Dave Hardman
14W–34L career
12%86%1%
2.67
0
Robert Burlingame
18W–35L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.