Teams

RLinder/Schoore (Lifetime)

2024 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Tues PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 DoublesLeonard Brecken / Todd Paris vs Todd Kasler / Howard Epstein4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStephen Polacek / David Joo vs Jim Bailer / Randy Loman1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-04-16vs ALawler (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesTodd Paris / Leonard Brecken vs Eric Ovendorf / Ron Dock7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRay Linder / Stephen Polacek vs Andrew Lawler / Kevin Staley6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-02vs JMorse/RTownsend (JCC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTodd Paris / Kirk Tatge vs Greg Hobby / RONALD TOWNSEND4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephen Polacek / Kenji Krzywosz vs Anthony Hyde / Graves Upchurch6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRay Linder / Mark Ciminelli vs Dana Goldfarb / Richard Williamson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-03-19vs NHerland (Raintree)Split 11
L#2 DoublesStephen Polacek / David Joo vs Michael Sinsheimer / Bo Bobrowski2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKirk Tatge / Todd Paris vs Jon Luther / Vincent Fitzgerald6-1, 7-5
2024-03-12vs DMurchElliot (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeonard Brecken / Todd Paris vs Jeff Allcock / Michael Rousseaux3-6, 2-6
2024-03-07vs RGallagher (River Hills)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKirk Tatge / Stephen Polacek vs Ed Huggins / Phillip Davis6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTodd Paris / Leonard Brecken vs Ian Clarke / Peter Hildner6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKenji Krzywosz / Stephen Polacek vs Jim Bailer / Jim Layne6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-02-20vs ALawler (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesTodd Paris / Stephen Polacek vs Todd Creange / Stephen Lovelace6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Stephen Polacek
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.49
Ray Linder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Todd Paris
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.15
Kirk Tatge
published
3.12
David Joo
published 3.5
3.12
Leonard Brecken
published
Kenji Krzywosz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ray Linder + Stephen Polacek15759% games+4.0% vs expected
Todd Paris + Kirk Tatge123 matchesnot enough data
Todd Paris + Stephen Polacek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stephen Polacek
99W–83L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Ray Linder
54W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Todd Paris
28W–47L career · 7 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
Kirk Tatge
12W–20L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
David Joo
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
Leonard Brecken
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
Kenji Krzywosz
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.