Teams

8-CHamilton-HVCC

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men-Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-05vs 2-TKharva-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Hamilton / Justin Nixon vs Tejas Kharva / Carlos Arias6-3, 6-3
2022-05-05vs 7-DWork-SVWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Nixon / Benjamin Perry vs John Stephens / Stephen Stark7-5, 6-2
2022-04-12vs 4-AYoung-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Nixon / William Lucas vs Ethan Holston / John Doe7-5, 6-1
2022-04-07Won 10
W#1 SinglesJustin Nixon vs Thomas McDonnell6-4, 7-5
2022-03-15vs 3-RGoff-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Nixon / Bryson Powell vs Ryan Goff / Charles Gordon6-1, 6-1
2022-03-03Won 10
W#1 SinglesJustin Nixon vs William Connelly6-1, 6-2
2022-03-01vs 1-CMoffitt-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesChris Hamilton / Justin Nixon vs Mark Petersen / Tanner Dellinger6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Justin Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.72
Bryson Powell
published 4
3.71
Benjamin Perry
published 4
3.59
Alex Herzick
published 3.5
3.52
Sean Selig
published
3.38
John Burkert
published
3.30
Andrew Freedman
published 3.5
Bo Clayton
published 3.5
3.21
Chris Hamilton
published 3.5
3.11
Dempsey Smith
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Hamilton + Alex Herzick5253% games+5.3% vs expected
Justin Nixon + Alex Herzick5157% games+4.8% vs expected
Bryson Powell + Justin Nixon4159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Justin Nixon
43W–30L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Bryson Powell
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Benjamin Perry
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
3.5
Alex Herzick
23W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.59
Sean Selig
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
John Burkert
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Andrew Freedman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Bo Clayton
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Chris Hamilton
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Dempsey Smith
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.