Teams

MBiringer

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-06vs MHeathWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsey Taylor / Celia Whited vs Lindsey Howard / Cara Kuremsky6-1, 7-6
2022-09-29vs SBrodsgaardLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Dennison / Celia Whited vs Shayne Brodsgaard / Marilyn Slaymaker0-6, 2-6
2022-09-22vs LVeit/BakerWon 10
W#1 DoublesMallory Biringer / Celia Whited vs Ashley Robertson / Meghan Paris6-3, 7-5
2022-09-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bissette / Adria McGlamery vs Lori Elliott / Elizabeth Thompson6-3, 6-1
2022-09-01vs KDay 5.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesMallory Biringer / Celia Whited vs Margaret Ann Gonella / Cayt Kirkman6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCristina Ennis / Adria McGlamery vs Emily Tripp / Mary Zimardo6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-25vs RMatthewsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAshley Whited / Celia Whited vs Emily Slater / Janna Myers4-6, 4-6
2022-08-18vs MHeathWon 10
W#3 DoublesLindsey Taylor / Adria McGlamery vs Lindsey Howard / Beth Rives7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Mallory Biringer
published 4
Celia Whited
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Cristina Ennis
published 3.5
2.83
Adria McGlamery
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Lindsey Taylor
published
Emily Warren
published 3
2.74
Jennifer Bissette
published
2.60
Ashley Whited
published 3
2.57
Haley Davies
published 3
Marciny Trice
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adria McGlamery + Lindsey Taylor4647% games+4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mallory Biringer
105W–49L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
4.03
3.5
Celia Whited
79W–80L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cristina Ennis
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Adria McGlamery
54W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
Lindsey Taylor
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Emily Warren
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Bissette
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Ashley Whited
8W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Haley Davies
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
2.57
Marciny Trice
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.