Teams

Beerman Wilkinson

2025 Polk Combo 18 & Over - Spring · 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-09vs Grasslands Roses - J. ThomLost 01
L#3 DoublesClara Copley / Heather Bonfil vs Jeri Thom / Dayna Cassidy2-6, 5-3
2025-05-19vs Polk/Clark/18&Over5.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesCourtney Jones / Heather Bonfil vs Lauren Lloyd / Kristin Pennewell1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBrooke Wilson / Clara Copley vs Ashley Bailey / Danielle Kendrick4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHilary Crenshaw / Karli Hughes vs Sandy Smyth / Caroline Miller2-6, 0-6
2025-05-16vs WHCC - J. CoconatoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Bonfil / Courtney Jones vs Monica Anderson / Amy Tully6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKarli Hughes / Courtney Larson vs Jenilee Coconato / Nikki Hoagland3-6, 4-6
2025-04-28vs Grasslands Roses - J. ThomWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Grimes / Courtney Larson vs Sara Margeson / Tatum Bennett5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Hollis / Brooke Wilson vs Rhonda Harris / Jeri Thom3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKarli Hughes / Leah Grieger vs Jenny Black / Stephanie Barron4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-25vs Beerman - N. EscowitzLost 03
L#1 DoublesCourtney Jones / Heather Bonfil vs Heather Padgett / Jennifer Chevalier6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMelissa Grimes / Clara Copley vs Tori Hogg / Zee Rodriguez5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKarli Hughes / Wendy Delgado vs Brandy Noel / Nicole Noel1-6, 1-6
2025-04-14vs WHCC - J. CoconatoWon 21
L#1 DoublesCourtney Larson / Heather Bonfil vs Monica Anderson / Kristan Sheffield5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLeah Grieger / Karli Hughes vs Elizabeth McWhorter / Carolina Vander Poel6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesHilary Crenshaw / Melissa Grimes vs Deanna Murchison / Britni Hall6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Courtney Larson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Clara Copley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Rachel Hollis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Hilary Crenshaw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Leah Grieger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.17
Melissa Grimes
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.07
Heather Bonfil
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Karli Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Wendy Delgado
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Courtney Larson
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Clara Copley
2W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Rachel Hollis
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Hilary Crenshaw
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46
Leah Grieger
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.45
Melissa Grimes
10W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Heather Bonfil
5W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Karli Hughes
2W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Delgado
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.