Teams

Pautch/Bella Vista/KTC

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 2.5 Novice - Women · 2.5 Novice - Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-20vs Coleman/Rogers/SVCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmanda Staggs / Sarah Pigo vs Sofie Coleman / Shanda Scott6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Gennace / Elizabeth Urizar Alonzo vs Brittany Lederer / Caitlin Simms0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-12vs McDougall/Rogers/SVCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gennace / Elizabeth Urizar Alonzo vs Jenna Woodard / Allison Hobbs6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Thompson / Sarah Pigo vs Jalan Little / Liz Lewis6-0, 6-1
2025-04-22vs McDougall/Rogers/SVCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Thompson / Amanda Staggs vs Allison Hobbs / Jenna Woodard6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Gennace / Heather Wardle vs Danyel Bischof-forsyth / Laura McDougall0-6, 1-6
2025-03-31vs Cockrell/Fayetteville/SRCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Gennace / Elizabeth Urizar Alonzo vs Kathryn Panek / Annie Lefforge1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Thompson / Amanda Staggs vs Allison Kepesky / Cassie Ross6-3, 6-4
2025-03-18vs Coleman/Rogers/SVCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKim Levitsky / Jennifer Gennace vs Erin Hulliberger / Shanda Scott6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Thompson / Heather Wardle vs Caitlin Simms / Brittany Lederer7-5, 7-6
2025-03-15vs Cockrell/Fayetteville/SRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKim Levitsky / Sarah Pigo vs Annie Lefforge / Lindsay Daniel7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmanda Staggs vs Rachel Cockrell3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Campbell / Jennifer Gennace vs Sarah Downing / Cassie Ross6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Novice - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Lacey Mitchell
published
3.42
Paul Pautsch
published
2.51
Sarah Pigo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.30
Elizabeth Urizar Alonzo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Amanda Staggs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
1.70
Heather Wardle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Gennace
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kim Levitsky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Urizar Alonzo + Jennifer Gennace123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lacey Mitchell
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
4.04
Paul Pautsch
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Sarah Pigo
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%47%53%
2.51
Elizabeth Urizar Alonzo
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Amanda Staggs
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Heather Wardle
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.70
Jennifer Gennace
4W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Levitsky
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.