Teams

DIABLO CC CW5.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 5.5

23 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Carisa Ferraioli
published 3
2.97
Tara Beane
published
2.95
Katy Drucker
published
2.90
2.89
Holly Hanks
published
2.88
Leslie Wuischpard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Kelly Feinstein
published
2.87
Jenee Rehrmann
published
2.85
Erika Woolley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Alix Allocco
published 3
2.80
Sara Parr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Carla Forgham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Dana Brent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Dana Pingatore
published 3
2.72
Michelle Gherlone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Sarah Bantz
published
2.46
Natalie Denning
published
2.46
Michelle Stratmore
published
2.38
Taylor Gibson
published
2.38
Danielle OConnell
published 2.5
Dana Gold
published 2.5
2.23
Athena Yost
published 2.5
2.12
Elizabeth Depaoli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Bantz + Erika Woolley4160% gamesnot enough data
Dana Brent + Tara Beane213 matchesnot enough data
Carisa Ferraioli + Kelly Feinstein303 matchesnot enough data
Carla Forgham + Erika Woolley213 matchesnot enough data
Carla Forgham + Michelle Gherlone213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carisa Ferraioli
12W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
Tara Beane
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.97
Katy Drucker
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.95
3
Chika Lewandowski
6W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Holly Hanks
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Leslie Wuischpard
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.88
Kelly Feinstein
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Jenee Rehrmann
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Erika Woolley
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.85
3
Alix Allocco
12W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Sara Parr
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.80
3
Carla Forgham
17W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Dana Brent
14W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Dana Pingatore
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
Michelle Gherlone
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%6%94%
2.72
Sarah Bantz
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%6%94%
2.71
Natalie Denning
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%61%39%
2.46
Michelle Stratmore
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%62%38%
2.46
Taylor Gibson
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Danielle OConnell
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Dana Gold
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Athena Yost
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Elizabeth Depaoli
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.