Teams

Durboraw

2025 FW Combo Tournament · 5.5 Ladies

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-25vs WagnerWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Trammell / Charlene Fung vs Jen Wagner / Alexis Quan6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMaura Jackson / Amina Dewolfe vs Michelle Ebbens / Anali Granados2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatrina Wagner / Dharmishtha Upadhyaya vs Sharon Ogbonna / Paro Norris7-5, 7-5
2025-05-24vs WagnerLost 12
L#1 DoublesLINDA FEATHERSTONE / Charlene Fung vs Sharon Ogbonna / Anali Granados7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTara Allen / Amina Dewolfe vs Michelle Ebbens / Alexis Quan6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJULIE PARKE / Dharmishtha Upadhyaya vs Paro Norris / Nilza Boldenow6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Maura Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Charlene Fung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Cindy Trammell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
JULIE PARKE
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Sam Martinez
published
2.54
Amina Dewolfe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.52
LINDA FEATHERSTONE
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Katrina Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Dharmishtha Upadhyaya
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Trammell + JULIE PARKE4743% games−2.9% vs expected
Sam Martinez + Charlene Fung404 matchesnot enough data
Katrina Wagner + JULIE PARKE123 matchesnot enough data
JULIE PARKE + Sam Martinez123 matchesnot enough data
Sam Martinez + Dharmishtha Upadhyaya123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maura Jackson
20W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
Charlene Fung
33W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.02
3
Cindy Trammell
32W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
JULIE PARKE
28W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Sam Martinez
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
2.5
Amina Dewolfe
19W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%38%62%
2.54
LINDA FEATHERSTONE
10W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Katrina Wagner
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
2.5
Dharmishtha Upadhyaya
9W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.