Teams

A18 5.0M TP Harris

2023 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over · NEOTA A18&O 5.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.62 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-10vs OH NEO A18 5.0M AppersonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJim Thomas / Merit Wagstaff vs Adam Krueger / Logan DeHaven4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesClement Marzol vs Wade Heerboth6-2, 6-3
2023-06-26vs OH NEO A18 5.0M AppersonWon 20
W#1 DoublesJim Thomas / Clement Marzol vs Zachary Apperson / Aris Jhaveri6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGreg Llewellyn / Merit Wagstaff vs Christopher Baranek / Logan DeHaven6-2, 7-6
2023-06-12vs OH NEO A18 5.0M AppersonLost 02
L#1 DoublesGreg Llewellyn / Jim Thomas vs Zachary Apperson / Aris Jhaveri6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRick Harris / Dominic Polifrone vs Robert Cross / Logan DeHaven1-6, 1-6
2023-06-05vs OH NEO A18 5.0M AppersonLost 02
L#1 DoublesGreg Llewellyn / Jim Thomas vs Zachary Apperson / Aris Jhaveri3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDominic Polifrone vs Wade Heerboth0-6, 0-6
2023-05-22vs OH NEO A18 5.0M AppersonWon 21
W#1 DoublesJim Thomas / Greg Llewellyn vs Aris Jhaveri / Alexander Hurtuk6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesClement Marzol vs Mark Beebe6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrian Curran / Rick Harris vs David Dukeman / Robert Cross1-6, 2-6
2023-05-15vs OH NEO A18 5.0M AppersonLost 02
L#1 DoublesClement Marzol / Matthew Harris vs Zachary Apperson / Adam Krueger2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDominic Polifrone vs Christopher Baranek1-6, 0-6
2023-05-08vs OH NEO A18 5.0M AppersonWon 21
W#1 DoublesPeter Harris / Greg Llewellyn vs Zachary Apperson / Mark Beebe6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesClement Marzol vs Aris Jhaveri6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Harris / Dan Wagstaff vs Adam Krueger / Robert Cross2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NEOTA A18&O 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OH NEO A18 5.0M Apperson4415922184
2A18 5.0M TP Harris4491532234

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Clement Marzol
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 5
Greg Llewellyn
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
Casey Johnston
published 4.5
Dominic Polifrone
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Brian Curran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dan Wagstaff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Merit Wagstaff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Peter Harris
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Clement Marzol
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Greg Llewellyn
17W–13L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Casey Johnston
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Dominic Polifrone
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Brian Curran
42W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Dan Wagstaff
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Merit Wagstaff
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Harris
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.