Teams

R-Papageorgiou Wise Aces/RR

2021-2022 Racquets & Jackets Doubles League · Women Division C (2.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-02-03vs R-Mizicko Net Setters/PeninsulaWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrooke Harris / Amy Ward vs Gail Quinlan / Michele Devinney6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnne Wages / Julie Lyerly vs Pam Wiebusch / Patty Howe6-0, 6-1
2022-01-13vs R-Hughes/Wilson/JettonWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Papageorgiou / Amy Ward vs Heidi Poulton / Lisa Druckenbrod6-3, 7-6
2022-01-06Split 11
L#1 DoublesElise Wehrum / Jennife Roberts vs Katrina Childers / Stephanie Schaeper1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMeredith Ortiz / Anne Wages vs Alix Bonnamour / Erin Taaffe2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Ward / Julie Lyerly vs Bonnie Zentner / Danielle Mikolajczyk1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-12-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Ward / Sally Watson vs Katherine Karnatz / Wendy Goodwin6-3, 6-2
2021-11-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElise Wehrum / Julie Lyerly vs Carrie Blackwell / Cindy Smithy3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women Division C (2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Amy Ward
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.34
Meredith Ortiz
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.33
Kendrick Anderson
published
3.33
Jennife Roberts
published
3.30
Julie Lyerly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Jennifer Saxton
published 3.5
Claire Allen
published 3.5
3.23
Amy Reaves
published 3.5
3.14
3.10
Megan McKinley
published
2.97
Anne Wages
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Tara Hauk
published
2.66
Elise Wehrum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Sally Watson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Lyerly + Elise Wehrum4840% games+2.9% vs expected
Julie Lyerly + Anne Wages303 matchesnot enough data
Amy Ward + Anne Wages303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Ward
243W–97L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.93
3.5
Meredith Ortiz
123W–106L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Kendrick Anderson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Jennife Roberts
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Julie Lyerly
82W–86L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Jennifer Saxton
89W–33L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Claire Allen
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Amy Reaves
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Jennifer Papageorgiou
14W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%13%87%
3.14
Megan McKinley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Anne Wages
45W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
Tara Hauk
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Elise Wehrum
28W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.66
Sally Watson
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.