Teams

HMTC SILVER

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-30vs MLF PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesJoe Whitlock / Steve Weber vs James Dyer / Lyle Petersen6-7, 4-6
2023-05-23vs MLF YELLOWLost 01
L#2 DoublesArte Libunao / Steve Weber vs Justin Bzdek / Jasjot Johar2-6, 3-6
2023-05-16vs LVTA ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesNick Hansen / Steve Weber vs Kenny Wiszt / Jason Boxerman3-6, 3-6
2023-05-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNick Hansen / Steve Weber vs Neal McConnellogue / Greg Lammons3-6, 4-6
2023-05-02vs FCCC WHITELost 01
L#1 DoublesSteve Weber / Nick Hansen vs Jon Clay / Christopher Jones1-6, 3-6
2023-04-25vs CSU GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesNick Hansen / Steve Weber vs Wade Bontempo / James DuPriest7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2023-04-18vs LVTA NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesNick Hansen / Steve Weber vs William Donkersgoed / Rob Davis6-1, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Arte Libunao
published 3.5
3.15
Fabio Sandri
published 3.5
3.10
Crip Erickson
published 3.5
3.05
Joe Whitlock
published
3.00
Steve Weber
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Brad Hutchings
published 3
Jim Draper
published
Nick Hansen
published
Wyatt Baier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Weber + Nick Hansen51146% games+1.7% vs expected
Arte Libunao + Nick Hansen044 matchesnot enough data
Steve Weber + Fabio Sandri134 matchesnot enough data
Steve Weber + Joe Whitlock314 matchesnot enough data
Brad Hutchings + Joe Whitlock134 matchesnot enough data
Fabio Sandri + Joe Whitlock134 matchesnot enough data
Crip Erickson + Joe Whitlock033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Arte Libunao
12W–27L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Fabio Sandri
13W–35L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Crip Erickson
27W–53L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Joe Whitlock
18W–37L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Steve Weber
84W–159L career · 7 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Brad Hutchings
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jim Draper
3W–48L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nick Hansen
11W–31L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wyatt Baier
1W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.