Teams

MoCo Magic

2024 Montgomery Adult 40 & Over · Montgomery Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.86 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-04-04vs Honey BadgersWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Schreiber / Megan Kessler vs Brenda Clark / Erin Kim5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFrankie Lawrence / Robin Brille vs Betsy Johnston / Karyn ODonnell4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKatharine Marino / Noelle Lynch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesBridget Foist / Kanika Sabor vs Kimberly Wells / Christy Sloan6-2, 6-3
2024-03-23vs BallbustersWon 10
W#1 SinglesVera Ryss vs Jemine Bryon6-3, 3-5
2024-03-11vs RubinoWon 21
W#1 DoublesParu Rellan / Megan Kessler vs Jana Toner / Jessica Somers7-5, 6-7
L#1 SinglesVera Ryss vs Christine Alewine3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKanika Sabor / Gina Faricy vs Carolyn Greis / Shan Wang6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-02-29vs BallbustersWon 20
W#2 DoublesParu Rellan / Megan Kessler vs Michelle Bryan / Tria Thalman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVera Ryss / Rebecca Hammond vs Cora Ho / Sharon Tennyson6-0, 6-3
2024-02-26vs FairbanksWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobin Brille / Frankie Lawrence vs Linda Gowen / Mesanie Lee7-5, 7-6
2024-02-20vs ReLEE SPICEyLost 02
L#1 DoublesKanika Sabor / Anne Hemeon vs Kimberly Wells / Christy Sloan3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMegan Kessler / Elizabeth Levy vs Kristina Leary / Kerry Spicer5-7, 1-6
2024-02-13vs Honey BadgersWon 10
W#1 DoublesKanika Sabor / Heather Schreiber vs Anita Wilson / Betsy Johnston6-0, 6-3
2024-02-05vs RubinoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMegan Kessler / Paru Rellan vs Carolyn Greis / Jana Toner6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHeather Schreiber / Bridget Foist vs Jessica Somers / Sarah Schrieber6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-01-11vs FairbanksWon 10
W#3 DoublesRebecca Hammond / Noelle Lynch vs Alison Serino / Andrea Motley6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Kanika Sabor
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.97
Gina Faricy
published 4
3.80
Paru Rellan
published
3.79
Sherry Altman
published
Bridget Foist
published 4
3.72
Heather Schreiber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Megan Kessler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.65
Vera Ryss
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.59
Robin Brille
published
3.58
Rebecca Hammond
published
3.58
Katharine Marino
published
3.49
Norma Mendelson
published
3.40
Shannon Golub
published
3.36
Elizabeth Levy
published 3.5
3.34
Lisa Schneiderman
published
3.33
Frankie Lawrence
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Charlotte Larson
published 4
Carrie Wofford
published 3.5
Noelle Lynch
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Laleh Mosavati
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Schreiber + Noelle Lynch4253% games−4.1% vs expected
Noelle Lynch + Megan Kessler5356% gamesnot enough data
Heather Schreiber + Megan Kessler3348% gamesnot enough data
Noelle Lynch + Frankie Lawrence4157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kanika Sabor
128W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.17
4
Gina Faricy
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
Paru Rellan
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Sherry Altman
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Bridget Foist
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Heather Schreiber
110W–72L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Megan Kessler
76W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Vera Ryss
103W–42L career · 7 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
Robin Brille
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Rebecca Hammond
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.58
Katharine Marino
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
Norma Mendelson
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.49
Shannon Golub
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.40
3.5
Elizabeth Levy
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
Lisa Schneiderman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Frankie Lawrence
73W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
4
Charlotte Larson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.30
3.5
Carrie Wofford
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Noelle Lynch
55W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laleh Mosavati
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.