Teams

The Deucebags 18+ 7.0

2023 Howard Columbia Mixed 18 & Over · Howard Columbia Mixed 18 & over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-19vs LevAle Up 18+ 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Wasson / Laura Haney vs James Forbes / Lisa Greenlee2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-05vs Get Some 18+ 7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJodi Saxman / Robert Lahmann vs Millette Miller / Phillip Ramil0-6, 0-6
2023-01-28vs Tightly Strung 18+ 7.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Haney / John Deleonibus vs Dominik Cieslak / Debra MacDonald6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJodi Saxman / Robert Lahmann vs Rosalba Davis / Jeffrey Soriano4-6, 5-7
2023-01-22vs Drunken Monkeys 18+ 7.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJodi Saxman / Robert Lahmann vs Christopher Montagu / Kathleen Cullins1-6, 1-6
2023-01-13vs Surfing The Net 18+ 7.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Deleonibus / Laura Haney vs Shrijoyee Ray / James Mellendick5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Lahmann / Jodi Saxman vs Katie Tetrault / Christopher Tetrault5-7, 1-6
2023-01-07vs YEPRO 18+ 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Haney / Robert Wasson vs Christopher Williams / Donna Slaughter4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Mixed 18 & over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
David Grosby
published 4
3.54
Tom Norris
published
3.47
John Deleonibus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Adam Drucker
published 3.5
3.35
Peggy Koele
published
3.30
Michael Maiorana
published
3.29
Laura Haney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Lynn Drucker
published
3.08
Shannon Shapiro
published
2.90
Jodi Saxman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Ann Maiorana
published 3
2.67
Amy Kluckhuhn
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Haney + John Deleonibus213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Grosby
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
Tom Norris
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
John Deleonibus
149W–94L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Adam Drucker
10W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%61%38%
3.46
Peggy Koele
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Michael Maiorana
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
Lynn Drucker
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Shannon Shapiro
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Jodi Saxman
28W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Ann Maiorana
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Amy Kluckhuhn
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.