Teams

Wyndham-Eccard

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-14vs Burkwood Cook WKDAYLost 05
L#1 DoublesMeigan Sullivan / Laureen Mertz vs Tara Sobel / Kimberley Dages6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMelanie Eccard vs Karen Albon4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Derco / Helen Wang vs Kay Lee / Donna Mourtzakis7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAnna Gibellato vs Yen Huynh4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEdyta Polkosnik / Robin Zachwieja vs Kandy Baserap / Emily Dages0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Rashelle Hayes
published
3.31
Melanie Eccard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Anna Gibellato
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Meigan Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Kumiko Suzuki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Kathleen Steiner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Susan Derco
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Robin Zachwieja
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Edyta Polkosnik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gabriella Kaszala
published
Laureen Mertz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meigan Sullivan + Laureen Mertz134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rashelle Hayes
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Melanie Eccard
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Anna Gibellato
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Meigan Sullivan
21W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Kumiko Suzuki
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
Kathleen Steiner
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Susan Derco
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Robin Zachwieja
7W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Edyta Polkosnik
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gabriella Kaszala
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laureen Mertz
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.