Teams

CCulbertson/KMartin (Sardis)

2022 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Wed PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-28Won 10
W#2 SinglesAnne Whalan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-18vs KWainscott (OPRC)Won 10
W#1 SinglesRachael Schuler vs Mary Kay Deering4-0
2022-06-29vs KWainscott (OPRC)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesAnne Whalan vs Patty Mullins1-6, 2-6
2022-06-08vs KWainscott (OPRC)Split 11
W#1 SinglesRachael Schuler vs Kimberly Valitchka6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesAnne Whalan vs Christina McWilliams2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Rachael Schuler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.81
Kathryn Martin
published
3.70
Sophie Graham
published
3.51
Anne Whalan
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Lynn Selland
published
3.27
Christina Thigpen
published 3.5
3.02
Mia Delmontagne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Whalan + Kathryn Martin5255% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rachael Schuler
298W–157L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
Kathryn Martin
39W–32L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Christine Pringle
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sophie Graham
23W–30L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Anne Whalan
111W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
Lynn Selland
18W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Christina Thigpen
40W–42L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Mia Delmontagne
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.