Teams

CVTA RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs TTA GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTamny Costello / Brooke Staton vs Sarah White / Carey Price6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKelly Bassin vs Allison Ivy6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelanie Banders / Ann Hensley vs Shonee Lesh / Tracy Wiske7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobin Noble / Michelle Gleason vs Summer Smith / Jenna McCormick2-6, 4-6
2026-07-06vs RCC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnn Hensley / Brooke Staton vs Chrissy Hasek / Laura Troudt6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMelanie Banders vs Perry Horner6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Hoeffler / Robin Noble vs Jessica Bruny / Tessa Clement6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatti Dietz / Michelle Gleason vs Yeon Ham / Lesley Johs6-3, 6-3
2026-06-29vs BRMST REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelanie Banders / Ann Hensley vs Janine Huber / Tracy Klein6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBrooke Staton vs Rumi Arakawa6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPatti Dietz / Kelly Bassin vs Sarah Monzyk / Jody Knaley6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmabel Akwa-Asare / Michelle Gleason vs Jennifer Carlson / Micheline Gardner7-6, 6-2
2026-06-22vs MEA REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnn Hensley / Melanie Banders vs Susan Boennighausen / Cynthia Shick6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKelly Bassin vs Wendy Morone6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTamny Costello / Carol Hoeffler vs Nicole Duster / Jacquie Prescott4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmabel Akwa-Asare / Zoe Vandeveer vs Marianne Martin / Annabel Stelling6-0, 6-1
2026-06-15vs LAC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesKelly Bassin / Brooke Staton vs Kristi Mark / Lindsay Roland6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmabel Akwa-Asare vs Jody Manning6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Hoeffler / Robin Noble vs Catherine Capparelli / Caitlin McTague6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesZoe Vandeveer / Tamny Costello vs Amy Grolnick / Laura Wonnacott6-4, 6-4
2026-06-08vs NJ TEALSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrooke Staton / Ann Hensley vs Lindsay Thompson / Teal Harada6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKelly Bassin vs Adrienne Beall6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMelanie Banders / Patti Dietz vs Justine McWhorter / Courtney Delfausse2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRuth Smith / Carol Hoeffler vs Sarah Propeck / Camille Tello1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-01vs BCC REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesMelanie Banders / Brooke Staton vs Alana Malone / Catherine Ruelas3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPatti Dietz vs Paige Walker6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRuth Smith / Carol Hoeffler vs Devon Winkles / Nancy Wigton3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Gleason / Tamny Costello vs Steffanie McCarthy / Jane McKean2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Ann Hensley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.99
Brooke Staton
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.94
Patti Dietz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.90
Kelly Bassin
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.80
Zoe Vandeveer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Melanie Banders
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Carol Hoeffler
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.74
Tamny Costello
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Amabel Akwa-Asare
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.52
Michelle Gleason
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Robin Noble
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Hensley + Brooke Staton7075% games+21.8% vs expected
Melanie Banders + Brooke Staton5355% games+10.3% vs expected
Ann Hensley + Melanie Banders3551% games+4.9% vs expected
Robin Noble + Carol Hoeffler5647% games−1.6% vs expected
Ann Hensley + Tamny Costello3447% gamesnot enough data
Tamny Costello + Robin Noble213 matchesnot enough data
Tamny Costello + Carol Hoeffler213 matchesnot enough data
Robin Noble + Patti Dietz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Hensley
47W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Brooke Staton
24W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Patti Dietz
32W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Kelly Bassin
11W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Zoe Vandeveer
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Melanie Banders
41W–42L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Carol Hoeffler
8W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Tamny Costello
44W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Amabel Akwa-Asare
23W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Michelle Gleason
10W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Robin Noble
15W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.